+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: Sir Paul gets married again (/showthread.php?tid=124953)
Pages:
1
2
Sir Paul gets married again - freeradical - 10-09-2011
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-15234138
Re: Sir Paul gets married again - Buzz - 10-09-2011
an oldie but a goodie
Re: Sir Paul gets married again - goodmanx - 10-09-2011
. . . but everyone knew her as nancy.
Re: Sir Paul gets married again - jdc - 10-09-2011
some people just cant stay single -- even when they should
Re: Sir Paul gets married again - sekker - 10-09-2011
jdc wrote:
some people just cant stay single -- even when they should
I was thinking the same thing.
Maybe he's just old-fashioned!
Re: Sir Paul gets married again - Jimmypoo - 10-09-2011
She's still on the rebound, started dating him while just separated after 25 years of marriage... the whole thing is insane.
This woman, despite her $$ assets, still hasn't demonstrated how to live on her own yet -- even to herself.
Re: Sir Paul gets married again - Jimmypoo - 10-09-2011
Watched the video... whoever his plastic surgeon is (her nose, looks like an off the shelf selection), is really good, and some celebs should take a lesson by looking at Paul -- and how that video shows him looking
like he did around 1985 (except for lacking gray hair!) facially...
Gee... Beatrice was the Flower Girl, but I guess women without 2 legs weren't allowed to be part of the
small audience at the wedding!
Re: Sir Paul gets married again - Yoyodyne ArtWorks - 10-10-2011
Gets married on John Lennon's birthday, yet another attempt to dilute attention given to Lennon in his pathetic campaign to prove he was the most important Beatle. [see Saturday Night Live appearance on anniversary of Lennon's murder.]
Re: Sir Paul gets married again - OWC Jamie - 10-10-2011
If you want it
here it is,
come and get it.
Make your mind up fast.
If you want it
anytime I can give it
but you better hurry
'cos it may not last.
Did I hear you say
that there must be a catch
will you walk away
from a fool and his money
If you want it,
here it is,
come and get it,
but you better hurry
'cos it's going fast.
Re: Sir Paul gets married again - Jimmypoo - 10-10-2011
>>yet another attempt to dilute attention given to Lennon in his pathetic campaign to prove he was the most important Beatle.
If there is such a campaign, it's the result of being dissed for a decade after John was killed, to make him the irrelevant one. Look at your "1" album. Count the songs. Who wrote what? It's damned near even, and that competition they had, like players on the same team, made them far more creative trying to impress each other, than any solo efforts to impress only themselves or critics.
As Paul himself said, "I was the person he chose to compose with... from 1957 to 1969, and I guess that means I was no slouch either. We wrote everything in the early days 'nose to nose'."
John agreed in an earlier interview that the term 'nose to nose' indeed was what they did. I think it unfortunate Paul felt he had to remind anyone of this.
The very genius of Lennon was the outlet of pain. The very genius of Paul was the outlet for his enthusiasm. Both embraced the notion of an almost "Jesuit Love" for all -- and while Lennon's positive tone works were 'dreamy' and less concrete, Paul's were upbeat and more tangible. One's Strawberry Field became more tangible as a result, and the other's Penny Lane became more like a playful daydream as a result.
The very fact that Paul helped John turn Help! from a slow crying out into a movie theme is not a coincidence. The fact that John found "fun" in certain Paul songs that he thrived upon (stoned or not) such as his entry to #2 that day... slamming out the intro to Ob-La-Dee --- (where there was none) - demonstrated that he both added and needed the upbeat influence to his swinging moods and internal confusion of where his place in the world really was...
Ringo says and so did George in a documentary, that "John may have been the LEADER, but it was Paul who was always pushing us to our next album, our next concept, and the next level of 'perfectionism'."
(I just watched parts of that documentary again, 5 days ago... the quotes are fresh in my head)
That both Paul and Yoko use "Hey Bulldog" (the video) as an example of how much they spontaneously contributed to each other's work -- and did so innately, is like the proverbial couple that finishes each other's sentences.
The fact that it was Paul who left London on his own initiative, visited Yoko, to then go rescue John from The Lost Weekend, because he felt the need, that he knew it was time for an intervention (after all... he had far more time with John than Yoko did at that point), shows a lack of understanding on the part of all who limit their view of the two of them to just that which is "The Beatles." Only recently did she admit that "Paul saved our marriage..." by that act. In fact - she said it A YEAR AGO... October 9th, 2010
The birthday coincidence is puzzling... however, the Daily Mail noted that Sir Paul said he was going to debut a new song written for Nancy, that evening at the reception - "on what would have been John's 71st birthday."
If you want links on the "Yoko/Paul saved our marriage" item... I've got the saved page from that day it was in the news. I never say what I don't know to be true. Never have - anywhere else or in the semi-permanance of the Forum. The link is below.
“I want the world to know that it was a very touching thing that he did for John,” Yoko tells London’s Times newspaper.
He stepped in and brought the two back together. John and Yoko met backstage at an Elton John concert in November 1974, which led to their reconciliation.
“He was genuinely concerned about his old partner. Even though John was not even asking for help; John, Paul, all of them, were too proud to ask anything. He helped. John often said he didn’t understand why Paul did this for us, but he did.”
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1386777/Yoko.webarchive
There is a gap below the pic of white space. be sure to scroll down. The above file will download on click. It is a SAFARI webarchive - only viewable in Safari. So when you double-click on it, it will open in Safari. It will NOT open if you are already using Safari when you click. It's an "archive" not html. The JPGs are embedded in the file, so even in Safari, it downloads first, then opens in Safari. A method of SAVING second only to using a PDF for a web page archive.