![]() |
And now Pakistan has some explaining to do - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: And now Pakistan has some explaining to do (/showthread.php?tid=116305) |
Re: And now Pakistan has some explaining to do - rjmacs - 05-02-2011 billb wrote: Actually, from the analysis i've read it seems that we weren't certain that Osama bin Laden was actually there until we found and killed him. This uncertainty was part of what delayed the operation, but for some reason or another President Obama decided that the evidence was sufficient to send in the Seals. I suspect that he was (understandably) concerned that OBL might have been surrounded by women and children, and a bloodbath could be a terrible outcome. It seems only one woman was killed (and several more injured) in this raid. Re: And now Pakistan has some explaining to do - Mac1337 - 05-02-2011 The fact that the woman was killed says the rules of engagement was to shoot all human shields. Interesting precedence. Re: And now Pakistan has some explaining to do - OWC Jamie - 05-02-2011 Dakota wrote: That's highly illogical Allah sharing secret video with you ? Re: And now Pakistan has some explaining to do - Black - 05-02-2011 Dakota wrote: That's a huge leap, even for you. Re: And now Pakistan has some explaining to do - Chakravartin - 05-02-2011 Dakota wrote: A "compound" is a fortified multiple-dweller house or a fortified series of housing units connected together. Those pictures show a "compound" and other compounds nearby. Stop being so stupid. Re: And now Pakistan has some explaining to do - $tevie - 05-02-2011 A "compound" can also simply be a cluster of buildings surrounded by a wall or fence, the fortified part isn't a prerequisite. For example, the Kennedy Compound in Hyannis Port or the Bush Compound in Kennebunkport, both of which have security of course but I wouldn't define them as being fortified. It occurs to me that perhaps this is Dakota's problem: he thinks a "compound" has to be a mansion of some sort. Re: And now Pakistan has some explaining to do - Mac1337 - 05-02-2011 Chakravartin wrote: A "compound" is a fortified multiple-dweller house or a fortified series of housing units connected together. Those pictures show a "compound" and other compounds nearby. Stop being so stupid. I don't care how many cinder block huts you string together. It is still no "compound". You are the stupid one who can see the car barely squeezed in there and still call it a compound. Besides, what do you care so much if it is a compound or not? Do you have the naming rights? Now, this is a compound. ![]() Re: And now Pakistan has some explaining to do - Chakravartin - 05-02-2011 Dakota wrote: You are the stupid one who can see the car barely squeezed in there and still call it a compound. Besides, what do you care so much if it is a compound or not? Do you have the naming rights? If you scroll up a bit, you'll see that YOU are the one who is making a fuss about whether or not it's a compound. And it's pretty stupid to obsess over that element of the event. I'll just assume that you're very bored and short on caffeine today. Re: And now Pakistan has some explaining to do - $tevie - 05-02-2011 Maybe he gets paid for every nit he picks. Re: And now Pakistan has some explaining to do - rankandfile - 05-02-2011 $tevie wrote: That's gonna make the chimpanzees mad. |