![]() |
Sit Room Photo Analysis - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Sit Room Photo Analysis (/showthread.php?tid=116514) |
Re: Sit Room Photo Analysis - Grace62 - 05-06-2011 Does this work better for you? Not everyone is comfortable with democracy. Re: Sit Room Photo Analysis - Mac1337 - 05-06-2011 You might want to see George Patton in the uniform of a corporal. No question who is in charge here. ![]() Re: Sit Room Photo Analysis - Grace62 - 05-06-2011 Do you think the people in that room weren't sure who was the commander in chief? He was in a very private meeting on a Sunday night with his closest advisers, there was no need for the formality of office. Re: Sit Room Photo Analysis - cbelt3 - 05-06-2011 The important key here for people to remember is that when a spec ops mission is going on, NOBODY in that room is saying ANYTHING to the team on the other end. That sort of Hollywood crap gets spec ops teams killed. Re: Sit Room Photo Analysis - Mac1337 - 05-06-2011 Grace62 wrote: This whole thread is about him sitting on the side. How can you say it is not significant? Re: Sit Room Photo Analysis - Grace62 - 05-06-2011 I reject the premise of the essay - I said that in my first comment. Re: Sit Room Photo Analysis - Lux Interior - 05-06-2011 If you like Obama, your interpretation will be positive. If you don't like him, it will be negative. Sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar. Re: Sit Room Photo Analysis - Gutenberg - 05-06-2011 I can't say I agree much with that breathless assessment. He made a very difficult decision and a big gamble. That's what we pay him to do. Let's not make him into a hero or a saint. Re: Sit Room Photo Analysis - DaveS - 05-06-2011 Gutenberg wrote: I second this observation. Re: Sit Room Photo Analysis - beagledave - 05-06-2011 Gutenberg wrote: Agreed. |