MacResource
Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? - Printable Version

+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? (/showthread.php?tid=167613)

Pages: 1 2 3 4


Re: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? - Ombligo - 05-28-2014

Better a pic of Kate than anyone else in the family


Re: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? - Spock - 05-28-2014

Ombligo wrote:
Better a pic of Kate than anyone else in the family

A picture of Charlie jug-ears wearing anal floss would make my eyes bleed.


Re: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? - mrbigstuff - 05-28-2014

Ombligo wrote:
Better a pic of Kate than anyone else in the family

perhaps you meant the other family

pippa


Re: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? - Lemon Drop - 05-28-2014

DeusxMac wrote:
Photoshop

and an extremely poor effort at that, I don't think even CNN would print that one.


Re: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? - SteveG - 05-28-2014

Ombligo wrote:
Better a pic of Kate than anyone else in the family

You ignore all the important work and innate handsomeness of the Saxe-Coburg/Gotha family?



Re: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? - Lemon Drop - 05-28-2014




Re: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? - OWC Jamie - 05-28-2014

There are thousands of identical pics of Kate's derriere online.
She's no prude unlike the photoshop deniers who can't contain their rampant envy.


Re: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? - cbelt3 - 05-28-2014

Say what you want, but the lad found a lovely bride. And she appears to have the spirit necessary for the job... a tough job at that.

And she's got a lovely bum.


Re: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? - Lemon Drop - 05-28-2014

billb wrote:
There are thousands of identical pics of Kate's derriere online.
She's no prude unlike the photoshop deniers who can't contain their rampant envy.

Oh, right! Phony photos never get replicated across the interwebs.

Unless she comes out publicly and says this photo is legit, I assume it's not. As with pretty much everything regarding these people.


Re: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? - SteveG - 05-28-2014

Billionaires can afford that type of stuff. Don't ask me how this happened: