+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: A topic concerning firearms (/showthread.php?tid=67648)
Pages:
1
2
Re: A topic concerning firearms - MacGurl - 12-05-2008
I see it as odd also. Things like this that Medicare will cover, but yet people still go wanting in this country for basic services? Sigh....
Kathy
Re: A topic concerning firearms - OWC Jamie - 12-05-2008
1. Where's the trigger lock ?
2. 9mm is 9mm. I don't care if it is slung by a rubber band, the shot should be classified as a weapon and handled as such.
edit:
-------------
used cars in Florida will now come with extra drain holes
looks like a product only a lawyer could love
Re: A topic concerning firearms - Black Landlord - 12-05-2008
Yes, kidding.
Medicare will ========n e v e r ====== cover this.
Medicare doesn't cover squat. For the most part HMOs key off medicare to decide what to cover as well. Much ado about something that never was.
Re: A topic concerning firearms - JoeH - 12-05-2008
I have a family member who works at the FDA doing reviews of drug applications for the chemistry involved. There have been some rules "loosening" over the last 7 years, the head counsels for the FDA appointed by the Bush administration to interpret laws and regulations applying to the FDA saw to that. From what I have been hearing, I am not surprised it got approval.
Re: A topic concerning firearms - DevoBill - 12-05-2008
I see this as a way around any gun ban. It's nearly the same as medical marijuana. Also this fits "we will guarantee you will pay nothing for this scooter is you insurance and Medicare refuse to pay for your hover round."
Re: A topic concerning firearms - Black Landlord - 12-06-2008
JoeH wrote:
I have a family member who works at the FDA doing reviews of drug applications for the chemistry involved. There have been some rules "loosening" over the last 7 years, the head counsels for the FDA appointed by the Bush administration to interpret laws and regulations applying to the FDA saw to that. From what I have been hearing, I am not surprised it got approval.
IT DID NOT GET MEDICARE APPROVAL. RTFA. (if you're not referring to medicare approval-- never mind.)
Re: A topic concerning firearms - Mac-A-Matic - 12-11-2008
SDGuy wrote:
I hope this is a joke. While I support the right for people to be able to defend themselves, it should NOT be subsidized by the rest of us. How could a firearm possibly be considered a necessary medical devise?
If you support the bailout (and I don't know if you do), then how can anyone protest subsidizing a medical device?