![]() |
The future of the Republican Party? - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: The future of the Republican Party? (/showthread.php?tid=73447) |
Re: The future of the Republican Party? - swampy - 03-02-2009 Rick-o wrote: Then why do you bother posting here, Rick? Are yours supposed to be the only posts worth reading? Somebody disagrees with you and you start whining? Re: The future of the Republican Party? - Don Kiyoti - 03-02-2009 swampy wrote: Then why do you bother posting here, Rick? Are yours supposed to be the only posts worth reading? Somebody disagrees with you and you start whining? There are some posters (you, Dakota, and to a lesser extent, Suzanne) whos opinions really aren't worth reading. But that doesn't make Rick's opinions the only ones worth the time. Re: The future of the Republican Party? - swampy - 03-02-2009 Don Kiyoti wrote: Then why do you bother posting here, Rick? Are yours supposed to be the only posts worth reading? Somebody disagrees with you and you start whining? There are some posters (you, Dakota, and to a lesser extent, Suzanne) whos opinions really aren't worth reading. But that doesn't make Rick's opinions the only ones worth the time. What arrogance, Don. And the correct word is "whose". Re: The future of the Republican Party? - Rick-o - 03-02-2009 swampy wrote: Then why do you bother posting here, Rick? Are yours supposed to be the only posts worth reading? Somebody disagrees with you and you start whining? Nope, I don't really care what you have to say either, swamps. Re: The future of the Republican Party? - Dennis S - 03-02-2009 swampy wrote: Then why do you bother posting here, Rick? Are yours supposed to be the only posts worth reading? Somebody disagrees with you and you start whining? There are some posters (you, Dakota, and to a lesser extent, Suzanne) whos opinions really aren't worth reading. But that doesn't make Rick's opinions the only ones worth the time. What arrogance, Don. And the correct word is "whose". I would not start correcting the spelling, typing and grammar of others, swampy. You will lose at that game. You've been getting a pass. Re: The future of the Republican Party? - $tevie - 03-02-2009 Spock wrote: :agree: ![]() Re: The future of the Republican Party? - swampy - 03-02-2009 At least I know the difference between who's and whose. LOL Re: The future of the Republican Party? - Dennis S - 03-02-2009 Like you know the difference in "capitol" and "capital"? When you say "LOL", are you lolling your tongue around in your mouth when you type? You are a joke. Re: The future of the Republican Party? - swampy - 03-02-2009 Well, Dennis... You'll just have to put up with me because I ain't going anywhere. Re: The future of the Republican Party? - Dennis S - 03-02-2009 How about apologizing to the poster who said "whos" or whatever it was? You hypocrite. You don't know the difference in "capital" and "capitol", yet you snidely correct someone else? |