![]() |
CAFE Mileage ratings... How would YOU react to 62mpg ? - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: CAFE Mileage ratings... How would YOU react to 62mpg ? (/showthread.php?tid=104242) |
Re: CAFE Mileage ratings... How would YOU react to 62mpg ? - Mac1337 - 10-03-2010 I don't know about engines? I bet you can't tell the difference between a camshaft and crankshaft. Reeling you back to the topic, parse my reply and answer them if you want to have an exchange. Let me shorten it for you, -The country came to a stand still with $4 a gallon gas, you want $12 a gallon? - No new technology came out of Europe after 30 years of $5 a gallon gas. - What is the real cost of a bag of potato chips and how much subsidy is in a bag? Re: CAFE Mileage ratings... How would YOU react to 62mpg ? - max - 10-03-2010 Grace62 wrote: Europeans did not need PC hybrids, they solved the issue by having super efficient diesels. Compare the mileages vs the additional manufacturing costs associated with a hybrid. Now we are pushing them into the same pit of PC stupidity ... Re: CAFE Mileage ratings... How would YOU react to 62mpg ? - Grace62 - 10-03-2010 Dakota wrote: Proving my point. Re: CAFE Mileage ratings... How would YOU react to 62mpg ? - Mac1337 - 10-03-2010 You got nothing then. Sorry to make you look bad. Re: CAFE Mileage ratings... How would YOU react to 62mpg ? - Grace62 - 10-03-2010 Grace62 wrote: If potato chips are that important to you, then use the Google. You brought that up, not me. Proving my point. Re: CAFE Mileage ratings... How would YOU react to 62mpg ? - Rick-o - 10-03-2010 Dakota wrote: It's ok, we know you don't comprehend the issues being discussed here. |