+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? (/showthread.php?tid=167613)
Re: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? - Lemon Drop - 05-29-2014
Or you spend hours defending a stupid statement.
I'm not defending anything you wrote bill, that's your job.
Re: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? - Mini 9 - 05-29-2014
I always wonder why women don't put some sort of weights in the bottom seam of dresses/skirts.
Since she CAN do that or have it done, AND does NOT wear proper underwear, she must not be that put off by the results. Because she CAN control that NO ONE can EVER do that to her again.
Iggy Azalea puts on TWO layers of underwear to prevent random other girls from trying to penetrate her in clubs... See, that's a woman that WANTS to stop things from happening and takes action.
Iggy explaining the finger problem (1:49 mark)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gpESLdCKLQ
Re: Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there? - N-OS X-tasy! - 05-30-2014
Mini 9 wrote:
I always wonder why women don't put some sort of weights in the bottom seam of dresses/skirts.
Isn't it obvious?