![]() |
Ding... Round Three - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Ding... Round Three (/showthread.php?tid=196511) |
Re: Ding... Round Three - Speedy - 10-20-2016 He looks small at the lectern because he is leaning in. He did it the whole debate and it gave her greater physical stature. Re: Ding... Round Three - Dennis S - 10-20-2016 Speedy wrote: Bad mic again. He figured it out this time. He ain't no dummy. Re: Ding... Round Three - $tevie - 10-20-2016 Speedy wrote: He can't stand without a podium!!! Re: Ding... Round Three - Speedy - 10-20-2016 No handshake at the end. He stayed back behind his lectern while she came to the front to shake Wallace's hand but she did not walk between the lecterns. Nasty business. Re: Ding... Round Three - Dennis S - 10-20-2016 Speedy wrote: He just called her a nasty woman. Re: Ding... Round Three - steve... - 10-20-2016 Speedy wrote: I noticed that too. One shoulder was higher and his head was cocked so much of the time (not to mention that stupid smirk on his face). Re: Ding... Round Three - $tevie - 10-20-2016 Trump lost. Too many lies, he lost steam as it went on and became incoherent again, and his answer about accepting the election result was childish and disturbing. Re: Ding... Round Three - SteveG - 10-20-2016 The network commenters have all focused on Trump's statement that he may not accept the results of the election. Sorry, Donald, that's not only a break with the basic philosophy of how the U.S. elects its leaders...but it is downright insane. Re: Ding... Round Three - Onamuji - 10-20-2016 Steve G. wrote: He made it through a half hour or more without going off the rails. Whether solid rehearsal or excellent drugs, however he did it that was impressive. Re: Ding... Round Three - bfd - 10-20-2016 Did anyone here (except DrugT) seriously expect Dumbf to "win" the debate? |