![]() |
CDC stats on breakthrough infection (minus the media hysteria) - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: CDC stats on breakthrough infection (minus the media hysteria) (/showthread.php?tid=258482) |
Re: CDC stats on breakthrough infection (minus the media hysteria) - JoeH - 08-02-2021 Sarcany wrote: Just a FYI, I wasn't talking about Senator Nutso's comments. I was talking about the study I previously referenced that was done before the 'agreement' and pause in funding. The article I cited today makes specific reference to that type of study. Scientists do not consider that type of research to be "Gain of Function." Rand Paul and other right-wingers have repeatedly tried to spin it as "Gain of Function" research by Chinese government stooges to further their political ends. Don't swallow the spin. Follow the science. Not swallowing anything, just waiting for China to provide the data the world has been waiting for since Feb., 2020. Again, not consuming any right-wing crap. Don't knee-jerk associate me with them just because it was in a recent news cycle. The paper that you cite examined the adaptability of a mouse-adapted SARS virus to mouse cells in-culture. How does that turn into SARS-COV2? That is just what they admitted to. Release it back into the wild and a couple of years of natural mutation will hide their work. I think that ends the discussion right there. Yep, because that last statement by FHM is a load of baloney. It may not be an expression of the craziest conspiracy theories, but is part of the same nonsense. Re: CDC stats on breakthrough infection (minus the media hysteria) - deckeda - 08-02-2021 Hah, no one asserting China intentionally created Covid is prepared to deal with the car after having caught it. But they do love the chase. It’s important to have goals beyond, “we proved they made this.” What you want to say is they intended (or did not care) to hurt everyone. No plausible rationale. What you want to say is there’s a benefit to them. See the above What you want to say is that even if it’s a mistake, it’s critical to know the source. It isn’t. |