+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: RIP: Depth of Field (/showthread.php?tid=95713)
Re: RIP: Depth of Field - mattkime - 04-14-2010
can't believe so many people are talking about 4x5. love mine, it needs to get out more.
Re: RIP: Depth of Field - space-time - 04-14-2010
mattkime wrote:
can't believe so many people are talking about 4x5. love mine, it needs to get out more.
taken out of context, this could lead to other interpretations...
Re: RIP: Depth of Field - Racer X - 04-14-2010
Mine's an 8x10! And its hard wood baby, hard!
Re: RIP: Depth of Field - deckeda - 04-14-2010
Racer X wrote:
Mine's an 8x10! And its hard wood baby, hard!
But does it have Dakota's "gay bokeh," or any other uses of expression that likely violate the TOS of this forum?"
Re: RIP: Depth of Field - mikebw - 04-14-2010
Mike Johnson wrote:
Funny, I'm at the point where I want to punch myself in the throat whenever somebody uses the word "bokeh" online.
I have similar feelings, except the punch is directed at the original utterer of the word, not myself.
Re: RIP: Depth of Field - mrbigstuff - 04-14-2010
beagledave wrote:
The OP seems to be lamenting that shallow depth of field is dominating more and more photographic shooting these days.
no, quite the opposite, hence my use of the tag: RIP. well, perhaps i didn't use the correctly disparaging language; i see your point.
i wish more people understood how to employ the DoF as a compositional tool.