+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: idiots rule - iPhone on WSJ (/showthread.php?tid=100330)
idiots rule - iPhone on WSJ - Fritz - 07-16-2010
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704682604575369311876558240.html?mod=WSJ_hps_MIDDLESecondNews
watch the video. Great sound huh? Especially when complaining about others technology.
What a frickin moron patrol. All they need is a Viagra commercial in front and they'd be as pointless as any other media.
And then our ehSteamed NY Senator Chuck (it wasn't me) Schumer jumps in with a letter.
feh!
Re: idiots rule - iPhone on WSJ - Will Collier - 07-16-2010
Fritz wrote:
And then our ehSteamed NY Senator Chuck (it wasn't me) Schumer jumps in with a letter.
feh!
The most dangerous place to stand in D.C. is between Chuck Schumer and a camera.
Re: idiots rule - iPhone on WSJ - Fritz - 07-16-2010
or a high school or college commencement speech
Re: idiots rule - iPhone on WSJ - deckeda - 07-16-2010
Didn't watch the video, but can imagine the manufactured angst displayed on it.
But I read the article, and at least it was a bit more in depth than the story that came out yesterday. I didn't realize carriers tested potential phones all that much, thinking that phone technology isn't moving very fast. It makes sense however, that a device should be certified prior to being allowed on their network.
Re: idiots rule - iPhone on WSJ - GGD - 07-16-2010
I suspect that if you go back and search you could find that some of the people who are now saying that there was a lack of real-world testing before release are the same ones who were outraged that Apple let an engineer take one to a bar and didn't keep every iPhone under lock and key in a windowless room in Cupertino.
Re: idiots rule - iPhone on WSJ - decay - 07-16-2010
http://therealfirstworldproblems.tumblr.com/