+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Christine O'Donnell...Supreme Court decisions, huh? (/showthread.php?tid=104808)
Christine O'Donnell...Supreme Court decisions, huh? - beagledave - 10-14-2010
Yeah it's reported at HuffPo, but the video clip speaks for itself. Another Palin moment.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/13/christine-odonnell-stumped-supreme-court-debate_n_762067.html
Lot of gravitas there, Ms. O'Donnell. Who gives a crap about witches, if a candidate running for the SENATE (you know, the body charged with advice and consent for SCOTUS nominees) knows jack about recent SCOTUS decisions...ummm buh bye.
Re: Christine O'Donnell...Supreme Court decisions, huh? - Mac1337 - 10-14-2010
I am sure you would have started a thread praising her if she knew the answer, right?
Re: Christine O'Donnell...Supreme Court decisions, huh? - $tevie - 10-14-2010
I am giving her a couple of points for not taking the easy Roe v. Wade way out when it was proffered to her. I'm more curious as to why Wolf Blitzer was so quick to throw that life preserver her way. Was he acting as a moderator or as her coach?
Re: Christine O'Donnell...Supreme Court decisions, huh? - beagledave - 10-14-2010
Dakota wrote:
I am sure you would have started a thread praising her if she knew the answer, right?
Why sure..I try to match your pro Democrat posts one to one..
Re: Christine O'Donnell...Supreme Court decisions, huh? - $tevie - 10-14-2010
Re: Christine O'Donnell...Supreme Court decisions, huh? - beagledave - 10-14-2010
And by the way Dakota, it's not as if there is only one "answer" to the question.
She had NO answer, NO opinion. Someone who wants to be a U.S. Senator can't reflect on a single recent SCOTUS decision?
Re: Christine O'Donnell...Supreme Court decisions, huh? - Dennis S - 10-14-2010
Dakota wrote:
I am sure you would have started a thread praising her if she knew the answer, right?
I bet he would have, because that would really be news.
Re: Christine O'Donnell...Supreme Court decisions, huh? - Dennis S - 10-14-2010
Andy Borowitz says Palin's evolution into O'Donnell proves Darwin was wrong:
http://www.borowitzreport.com/2010/10/12/palins-evolution-into-odonnell-proves-darwin-was-wrong/
Re: Christine O'Donnell...Supreme Court decisions, huh? - michaelb - 10-14-2010
The clip is almost painful to watch. The other guy took the obvious, easy pitch (and didn't quite hit it out of the park).
Re: Christine O'Donnell...Supreme Court decisions, huh? - Mac1337 - 10-14-2010
beagledave wrote:
And by the way Dakota, it's not as if there is only one "answer" to the question.
She had NO answer, NO opinion. Someone who wants to be a U.S. Senator can't reflect on a single recent SCOTUS decision?
What is this? A midterm? I am sure Castle could rattle off the answers to your liking, but that is not what I am looking for in a senator. I want a common sense folk who calls Reid out and asks him how are you going to cover 30 million new people at no cost? How are you going to force all these nonpaying customers and save money? And after the bill is passed and premiums rise almost instantly to call him out again and ask how stupid can he be?
What the Supreme Court did belongs in history classes.