![]() |
Geek question before bed: Images in databases - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: Geek question before bed: Images in databases (/showthread.php?tid=10929) |
Geek question before bed: Images in databases - Greg the dogsitter - 05-09-2006 In this case, MySQL. Store the images in the database, or just store references to their locations? Re: Geek question before bed: Images in databases - Seacrest - 05-09-2006 References. That is generally the way to go. Re: Geek question before bed: Images in databases - StingMe - 05-09-2006 Ditto. Re: Geek question before bed: Images in databases - mattkime - 05-09-2006 Ditto ditto Re: Geek question before bed: Images in databases - TheCaber - 05-09-2006 Ditto ditto ditto. Oh, and what they said above. References. Most databases do an incredibly poor job of storing and retrieving variably-sized entities of any type, let alone binary large objects (BLOBs) like images, audio or video. Those that do a decent job store/use references to specify where the object data can be found. The references are of a known size and can be allocated/sorted/stored easily. The downside is that the data object can be (re)moved without the reference being removed or updated. TANSTAAFL |