![]() |
Perestroika - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Perestroika (/showthread.php?tid=167186) Pages:
1
2
|
Perestroika - Chakravartin - 05-14-2014 This might just be the way human exploration of space ends and the extinction of our species becomes easily foreseeable. http://www.newsweek.com/russia-pulls-space-cooperation-response-ukraine-sanctions-250869?piano_t=1 Russia Pulls Space Cooperation in Response to Ukraine Sanctions Re: Perestroika - DeusxMac - 05-14-2014 Go SpaceX! (Perhaps prematurely optimistic, but...) http://motherboard.vice.com/en_ca/read/russias-new-space-sanctions-mean-spacex-is-about-to-get-paid Re: Perestroika - rjmacs - 05-14-2014 Yeah, that's all great unless Mother Russia uses her thrusters to de-orbit the Russian section of the ISS into the atmosphere a few years early.... Re: Perestroika - max - 05-14-2014 Chakravartin wrote: As if Obama did not start the idiotic process.... http://www.bis-space.com/2014/04/03/12556/obama-bans-nasa-russia-contact Obama bans NASA-Russia contact Re: Perestroika - Chakravartin - 05-14-2014 max wrote: A surprisingly good point from you. This is a president who doesn't seem to understand or properly value the expansion of human knowledge of the universe. While he's paid attention to the environment, health care and basic science education, except for budget cuts he's largely ignored NASA, NIH and the NSF. To my mind, it's similar to his odd position on civil liberties: - Guns good; Free speech bad. - Eight Amendment good; Fourth through seventh bad. - 9th-10th Amendments... Let's pretend those don't exist. (No position on the 3rd Amendment as yet.) If you're going to promote yourself as pro-science (or pro civil liberties) then you should embrace the whole package. Re: Perestroika - DeusxMac - 05-14-2014 "NASA is laser focused on a plan to return human spaceflight launches to American soil, and end our reliance on Russia to get into space. This has been a top priority of the Obama Administration’s for the past five years, and had our plan been fully funded, we would have returned American human spaceflight launches – and the jobs they support – back to the United States next year. With the reduced level of funding approved by Congress, we’re now looking at launching from U.S. soil in 2017." Re: Perestroika - max - 05-14-2014 Chakravartin wrote: A surprisingly good point from you. Reading your own prejudices into my posts usually results with that kind of a reaction.... Re: Perestroika - Chakravartin - 05-14-2014 DeusxMac wrote: With the reduced level of funding approved by Congress, we’re now looking at launching from U.S. soil in 2017." Obama's proposed budgets have repeatedly cut NASA funding. http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2014/03/05/nasa_budget_2015_more_cuts_more_politics.html Earth Science: cut by $56 million (given that so many in Congress are climate change deniers who want to cut Earth-observing missions, I think this may be a mistake). Astrophysics: cut by $61 million (including mothballing the wonderful SOFIA aircraft unless a German partner can pony up the cash; see page 15 of the report). Planetary Science: cut by $65 million. That last one is almost a victory, given how the White House has tried to eviscerate planetary exploration over the past few years. But don’t be fooled; these cuts would hurt. A lot. (Note added after I wrote this article but before it was posted: Casey Dreier at The Planetary Society has more on this situation.) Re: Perestroika - cbelt3 - 05-14-2014 Even during the cold war there was cooperation between the USSR and US in space. This is sad. Even sadder that the defective development and Congressionally inspired insanity known as the procurement process gave us NO manned space capablity for the next many years. Re: Perestroika - Mac1337 - 05-15-2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVf7m_YZ2zY |