Ken Sp. wrote:
There is substantial skullduggery in the altered video.
Entertaining, but not accurate.
Discussed earlier in this post.
https://forums.macresource.com/read.php?1,3007531

A group of Tesla fans and investors has inadvertently exposed Tesla’s shadiness regarding crashes involving Autopilot by attempting to claim that the advanced driver-assist system was not active in a crash test.

It was not only active, but it also disengaged itself less than a second before the crash—a known shady behavior of Tesla’s Autopilot.

… In NHTSA’s investigation of Tesla vehicles on Autopilot crashing into emergency vehicles on the highway, the safety agency found that Autopilot would disengage within less than one second prior to impact on average in the crashes that it was investigating…

This would suggest that the ADAS system detected the collision but too late and disengaged the system instead of applying the brakes.

Cast in the light friendliest to Tesla, you could argue that returning control to a human operator makes sense whenever any automated control system detects circumstances beyond its ability to handle. But FSD effectively saying "It's all yours, bud" 500 ms before certain impact feels more like an attempt to create legal confusion that favors Tesla in liability lawsuits.

ztirffritz wrote:
A human driver would have done no better.