MacResource
I need a recommendation for a new scanner 11 x 17 - Printable Version

+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: I need a recommendation for a new scanner 11 x 17 (/showthread.php?tid=44337)



I need a recommendation for a new scanner 11 x 17 - weapon - 11-29-2007

This will be hooked up to a pc workstation.

Possible choice: Epson GT-15000 Professional Scanner

Other suggestions?

Best place to buy???


Re: I need a recommendation for a new scanner 11 x 17 - jdc - 11-29-2007

does anyone else make a 11 X 17 scanner any more?

microtek maybe?


Re: I need a recommendation for a new scanner 11 x 17 - Racer X - 11-29-2007

damn rare. even legal sized are unusual these days.


Re: I need a recommendation for a new scanner 11 x 17 - mattkime - 11-29-2007

go for the epson. definitely worth it.


Re: I need a recommendation for a new scanner 11 x 17 - vision63 - 11-29-2007

From Microtek: http://support.microtek.com/knowledgebase_1/kbdtl.phtml?request=KB-00009SM&vw=0

Q. ScanWizard 5 does not work with my Macintosh OS 10.5. How can I fix this?

A. There are currently no ScanWizard 5 drivers for Macintosh OS 10.5. Our developers are testing on this new operating system. At this time, there is no date for an official Leopard release.

Was this article helpful?
Please take a moment to send feedback regarding this article. Your information will greatly help us improve the quality of our support documents.

Thank you.


1. Was this article helpful? *
Yes, the article was helpful
No, I want to perform another search.
No, I want to contact support.

2. What is your feedback on the article above? *
This article was very informative
This article is sufficient but lacks detail
This article is unclear
This article is too technical for me
This article is missing information
This article did not answer my question or concern

3. Please enter a brief explanation of your selection in no. 2: (700 char. limit)


4. Please enter the information you were looking for: (700 char. limit) *