+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Getting rid of Harry Reed might be tougher than anyone thought. (/showthread.php?tid=67572)
Getting rid of Harry Reed might be tougher than anyone thought. - mikeylikesit - 12-04-2008
The indictment does not say that any money is missing or that Mr. Krolicki profited or benefited, but charges that he did not provide the required accounting trail for large sums and destroyed documents related to the handling of the money. wrote:Harry must go
Re: Getting rid of Harry Reed might be tougher than anyone thought. - Panopticon - 12-04-2008
of course you meant Senator Harry M. Reid...
Even a junior DA can get a grand jury to indict, and an indictment is not a conviction, so Lt. Gov. Krolicki is presumed innocent for the moment.
what an effed up country we have :judge:
Re: Getting rid of Harry Reed might be tougher than anyone thought. - mikeylikesit - 12-04-2008
My vowel centric dyslexia doesn't make Reid more competent. He and Pelosi may well be be the undoing of this administration.
Re: Getting rid of Harry Reed might be tougher than anyone thought. - $tevie - 12-04-2008
mikeylikesit wrote:
My vowel centric dyslexia doesn't make Reid more competent. He and Pelosi may well be be the undoing of this administration.
You always manage to find the cloud behind the silver lining...
Re: Getting rid of Harry Reed might be tougher than anyone thought. - lafinfil - 12-04-2008
I thought that's why Obama picked Rahm Emanuel, to keep the rank and file in line