![]() |
A topic concerning firearms - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: A topic concerning firearms (/showthread.php?tid=67648) Pages:
1
2
|
A topic concerning firearms - voodoopenguin - 12-05-2008 I am a believer in very strict gun control but I do understand that for many of you lot over in the USA your 'right to bear arms' is quite a big deal. Not for me to really comment on that as I am not from the USA but this news item did attract my attention. I am also a believer that as much as possible of ordinary life should be available to as many as possible despite disabilities so even though I am against easy gun access in my own country I am happy that a gun for people with physical disabilities is available in the USA however I still cannot get my head around this line. "The Palm Pistol has been certified as a Class I Medical Device by the US Food and Drug Administration, Constitution Arms said." It seems very close to being an oxymoron. http://uk.news.yahoo.com/5/20081205/twl-guns-on-prescription-for-elderly-3fd0ae9.html Re: A topic concerning firearms - Black Landlord - 12-05-2008 It's true voodoo, my mom has 3 of those, all paid for 100% by Medicare. Reminds me of a joke the germans like to tell: "Why do americans eat with one hand? So they can hold the gun under the table with the other." Re: A topic concerning firearms - DevoBill - 12-05-2008 http://medgadget.com/archives/2008/12/medicare_to_cover_prescription_handguns.html ![]() Constitution Arms contacted us with the following information: Re: A topic concerning firearms - Spock - 12-05-2008 Of course it's a medical device. Use the device and someone will need medical treatment. See, wasn't that easy. Re: A topic concerning firearms - AlphaDog - 12-05-2008 Black Landlord wrote: Why? Not just "why one?" but also "why three?" For anyone interested in complaining about the waste of Medicare dollars, here's a good place to start. Re: A topic concerning firearms - karsen - 12-05-2008 AlphaDog wrote: Why? Not just "why one?" but also "why three?" For anyone interested in complaining about the waste of Medicare dollars, here's a good place to start. I think, perhaps, he was joking. Re: A topic concerning firearms - AlphaDog - 12-05-2008 karsen wrote: Why? Not just "why one?" but also "why three?" For anyone interested in complaining about the waste of Medicare dollars, here's a good place to start. I think, perhaps, he was joking. I'd like to think so, but ya just never know! I did consider that, since I thought they said the company was currently taking orders, but I didn't notice how old the article was. That BL sure is a trouble maker. ![]() Re: A topic concerning firearms - cbelt3 - 12-05-2008 OK, that is just weird and kind of silly. The whole idea of a defensive firearm is that you take care of business BEFORE your attacker can touch you. A contact weapon like that.. well, it's just as easy to use a Taser or stun iPod. Personally, I prefer to take care of attackers out at about 300 meters. That way you don't even have all that goopy stuff on your own yard. (Yes, I AM being sarcastic) Re: A topic concerning firearms - kj - 12-05-2008 I think most everyone here would find that pretty odd. Elderly people are quite vulnerable, but still... I would say it is a phenomenon related to the hyperlegalism/commercialism deal we have going on (and have for a while). kj. Re: A topic concerning firearms - SDGuy - 12-05-2008 I hope this is a joke. While I support the right for people to be able to defend themselves, it should NOT be subsidized by the rest of us. How could a firearm possibly be considered a necessary medical devise? |