![]() |
3 Slots are Faster Than 4! - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Tips and Deals (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3) +--- Thread: 3 Slots are Faster Than 4! (/showthread.php?tid=74239) |
3 Slots are Faster Than 4! - Harbourmaster - 03-12-2009 At least that's what the preliminary data suggests... Latest test's on Memory in the "New" MacPro seems to verify that max performance is achieved by filling only 3 of the 4 slots in each memory bank! http://www.barefeats.com/nehal04.html They work in 3s. - RAMd®d - 03-12-2009 I heard that on one of the latest TWiTs or MacBreak Weeklys. Instead of upgrading in pairs, the best performance (interleaving?) is done in triples. Re: 3 Slots are Faster Than 4! - timg - 03-12-2009 So, now we have independent confirmation that the Quad core box is crippled by having only 4 slots. |