+- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com)
+-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6)
+--- Thread: Please please please (please) let these scum-sucking media whores be charged with something (/showthread.php?tid=88803)
Please please please (please) let these scum-sucking media whores be charged with something - Black - 12-02-2009
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091202/ap_on_en_ot/us_uninvited_guests
Their whole statement: "I can tell you we did not party-crash."
(OK, so tell me . . .)
Re: Please please please (please) let these scum-sucking media whores be charged with something - Seacrest - 12-02-2009
Was looking for Tiger Woods.
Leaving disappointed.
Re: Please please please (please) let these scum-sucking media whores be charged with something - mattkime - 12-02-2009
I'd prefer we simply ignored them, although i realize thats not remotely possible.
Re: Please please please (please) let these scum-sucking media whores be charged with something - $tevie - 12-02-2009
mattkime wrote:
I'd prefer we simply ignored them, although i realize thats not remotely possible.
I know! We are giving them exactly what they want.
Re: Please please please (please) let these scum-sucking media whores be charged with something - Doc - 12-02-2009
What's the problem?
Their explanation seems plausible and excusable.
'Looks like the Secret Service had a security-lapse. 'Nice that they've caught it and are tightening security at future functions.
End of story.
Re: Please please please (please) let these scum-sucking media whores be charged with something - Seacrest - 12-02-2009
$tevie wrote:
[quote=mattkime]
I'd prefer we simply ignored them, although i realize thats not remotely possible.
I know! We are giving them exactly what they want.
Who?
Re: Please please please (please) let these scum-sucking media whores be charged with something - $tevie - 12-02-2009
-D
Re: Please please please (please) let these scum-sucking media whores be charged with something - Black - 12-02-2009
Doc wrote:
What's the problem?
Their explanation seems plausible and excusable.
'Looks like the Secret Service had a security-lapse. 'Nice that they've caught it and are tightening security at future functions.
End of story.
So, a fun game with no legal consequences for others who want to enter the White House uninvited?
Re: Please please please (please) let these scum-sucking media whores be charged with something - Black - 12-02-2009
$tevie wrote:
[quote=mattkime]
I'd prefer we simply ignored them, although i realize thats not remotely possible.
I know! We are giving them exactly what they want.
This post is what's going to sustain them for the next few hours.
Re: Please please please (please) let these scum-sucking media whores be charged with something - Mac1337 - 12-02-2009
It is amazing how many doors open up for you if you are tall, thin and blonde.