![]() |
Sen. Shelby puts a "hold" on most (if not all) pending nominations - Printable Version +- MacResource (https://forums.macresource.com) +-- Forum: My Category (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: 'Friendly' Political Ranting (https://forums.macresource.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=6) +--- Thread: Sen. Shelby puts a "hold" on most (if not all) pending nominations (/showthread.php?tid=92410) Pages:
1
2
|
Sen. Shelby puts a "hold" on most (if not all) pending nominations - Ted King - 02-05-2010 http://blog.al.com/live/2010/02/senate_leader_shelby_blocking.html Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Tuscaloosa, is blocking Senate action on executive branch nominations, a spokeswoman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said this afternoon in an e-mail. Matt Ygesias asks a good question: http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2010/02/richard-shelby-shuts-the-government-down.php Why, after all, should a great nation of 300 million people have a functioning government if preventing the government from functioning can help a lone Senator advance parochial interests? This is a truly horrible precedent. ANY Senator can do the same thing. This could easily open up a supertanker full of worms. The Senate is becoming more and more dysfunctional. Re: Sen. Shelby puts a "hold" on most (if not all) pending nominations - mick e - 02-05-2010 Pretty soon they will be blocking nominations on the grounds that the Senate Cloak room lost some cufflinks. Re: Sen. Shelby puts a "hold" on most (if not all) pending nominations - lafinfil - 02-05-2010 So much for the party of small government Kit Bond did the same thing - holding up Martha Johnson's GSA appointment that had previously been a 94-2 vote until Bond used it to get a new building in KS-MO His tune suddenly changed when Obama called him out on it during his talk to the Republicans http://www.kansascity.com/business/story/1728394.html Re: Sen. Shelby puts a "hold" on most (if not all) pending nominations - mick e - 02-05-2010 NYTimes wrote: ...According to his spokesman, Senator Shelby placed the holds over concerns he’s raised about a proposed contract involving a tanker (Northrop Grumman has interests in Alabama); and over financing he’s sought for building a counterterrorism center in Alabama. Because nothing is more pressing than the PUMMELING Alabama has been forced to endure at the hands of TERRORISTS. http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/white-house-blasts-shelby-hold-on-nominees/ Re: Sen. Shelby puts a "hold" on most (if not all) pending nominations - cbelt3 - 02-05-2010 Been done before, and will be done again. Re: Sen. Shelby puts a "hold" on most (if not all) pending nominations - Ted King - 02-05-2010 cbelt3 wrote: I tried to find out about that, but didn't have much luck. Who has put a hold on such a large number of nominees at one time in the past? Re: Sen. Shelby puts a "hold" on most (if not all) pending nominations - Mike Sellers - 02-05-2010 Read the first 100 pages of Robert Caro's "Master of the Senate" and you'll see what a sorry state the Senate devolved into by the early 50s. Sadly, we're there again. Where's Lyndon Johnson when you need him? Re: Sen. Shelby puts a "hold" on most (if not all) pending nominations - mick e - 02-05-2010 Press Register wrote: Here's hoping Shelby has a "wide stance" on this issue. Re: Sen. Shelby puts a "hold" on most (if not all) pending nominations - Mac1337 - 02-05-2010 What senate rule is he breaking? Re: Sen. Shelby puts a "hold" on most (if not all) pending nominations - mick e - 02-05-2010 The "being a huge dick" rule. And that's quite an accomplishment considering you are talking about the US Senate. |