Posts: 4,848
Threads: 581
Joined: Jun 2025
Reputation:
0
I don't see why Apple is responsible for your poor taste in bitrates.
Next time, try reading a review or even just asking the clerk. Life's WAY too short to endure bad* bitrates.
*bad bitrates are different than "baaad mbitrates," which are frequently hilarious or otherwise enjoyable in their badness.
chas_m
(seriously it would be very cool if this was a new trend-- I have no use for 128k-sampled files)
Posts: 21,885
Threads: 1,109
Joined: Mar 2024
Reputation:
0
I seem to remember Apple saying at the opening of the iTunes music store that there would be optional 'audiophile' qualtiy downloads, using their Lossless Codec. But, I guess that never panned out, or I was just dreaming.
Last few songs I purchased from iTMS were 128kbps .m4p files, an increase would be nice but I doubt that would have a positive effect on their bottom line. It would mean more bandwidth costs and a lower overall margin per download. That and the unwashed masses just don't even care or know the differece between 128 and higher bitrate files.