Posts: 5,387
Threads: 567
Joined: Nov 2023
Article Accelerator wrote:
'struth. Apple sucks.
(Happy now, IronMac? BTW, how did your company help out?)
First of all, did I say that Apple dropped the ball on this one? No. My disagreement is with the word "amazing". Apple did some, yes, but it's a meh. If you don't like my opinion then you don't like my opinion just as I didn't like the use of the word "amazing" to characterize Apple actions.
Second, does it matter what my company did or did not do? That's not really relevant to my point is it?
Posts: 5,387
Threads: 567
Joined: Nov 2023
haikuman wrote:
I think he just wants to know if your company is un-amazing or semi-amazing or just flaking-amazing....
Just put your hands where we can see them and answer the questions bucko ~@~ :jest: 
lap: :devil:
If he wants to know that then start a new thread.
Posts: 5,387
Threads: 567
Joined: Nov 2023
Oh, on a personal note about charity, this year I have spent C$500 on a stray cat that was attacked by a stray dog.
Last year, I spent over C$3000 or more on stray cat bills.
I think I've got more right than anyone on here to label something as "amazing" when it comes to charity.
Posts: 52,144
Threads: 2,793
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
1
I think I've got more right than anyone on here to label something as "amazing" when it comes to charity.
You think you bought the rights to declare what's amazing?
So those who spend more have more rights to declare what's amazing?
You actually managed to make charity sound cheap and self-serving.
Well done.
