Utah Students Upset About Altered Yearbook Pics

[Ombligo]

jdc wrote:
My 3rd grader's school photos had a "retouch" option when ordering, it was an extra $10? I think.

my youngest had a huge scrape on her face from taking the most awesome face plant known to man playing soccer and I *still* would never retouch it out.

A few minutes old on the left, a few days old on the right. =)

So how was the visit from Child Protective Services?

[Speedy]

Looks like the entire girls cross-country team is in violation.

[kj]

Don't pretty much all schools have dress codes? And I hate to say it, but I can understand why they might have a little higher standards for yearbook pictures. I will say I don't find the pics particularly immodest though. I can see where it might not represent the school in the way they might like though (schools seem to be increasingly concerned with PR). kj.

[Black]

District officials apologized about the alterations being applied inconsistently and said they were evaluating the policy on doctoring photos.

I'm picturing a document that says "Photo Doctoring Policy" at the top....

[TheTominator]

Rick-o wrote:
their school yearbook photos were digitally altered, with sleeves and higher necklines drawn on to cover bare skin.

http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/05/29/41...cover.html

Is it because they are minors that they are denied the right to bare arms?

[raz]

graylocks wrote:
[quote=bfd]
Hasa Diga Eebowai!

:devil:

and the forum censor bots haven't a clue.
Does it mean "no worries for the rest of your days?"

[gabester]

raz wrote:
[quote=graylocks]
[quote=bfd]
Hasa Diga Eebowai!

:devil:

and the forum censor bots haven't a clue.
Does it mean "no worries for the rest of your days?"
I thought that was "Hakuna matata"?

[Mike Johnson]

Hahaa. I know it’s a week late but here’s a page from that very same yearbook: