Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Agents See FBI Chief Comey as a ‘Dirty Cop’
#1
http://spectator.org/former-u-s-attorney...dirty-cop/
Reply
#2
The "source" for this article is not an FBI agent, but rather Joe DiGenova, who has made a career out of selling faked stories about the Clintons to an ever-willing-and-credulous right-wing press.

In short, it's the usual slimy right-wing fact-free BS machine. Check it out if you like, but hold your nose if you do.
Reply
#3
Actually no, the story is not faked as Clinton was under FBI scrutiny at the time.
You and the linked article are hanging your hats on circular argument that Joe DiGenova is discredited because Clinton was not indicted by FBI, while DiGenova was predicting she was going to be because of the amount of evidence against her.
In fact the evidence was still there and many others with the same amount of evidence or less have been pursued and hounded by the state, only Clinton got a pass and that by itself does not discredit the former US attorney, it actually discredits Loretta Lynch and James Comey for their political decision to let Clinton slide.
So unless you got any other grounds to discredit DiGenova in this context your accusation, your pathetic Clinton defense by attacking her accusers, fails flat as being full of bs....

Reply
#4
You didn't read the link, did you, Max?

DiGenova Falsely Claimed Members Of The Military Were "Relieved Of Their Duty Because They Insisted That There Be A Military Response" To Benghazi Attacks.

Shown to be BS.

DiGenova Baselessly Alleged That Obama Administration Tried To Cover Up Theft Of Hundreds Of Surface-To-Air Missiles In Benghazi.

Imagined: DiGenova did not name his sources for this claim, acknowledged that some of his information is not "verifiable," and provided no evidence to back up the allegation.

DiGenova Was Involved In Discredited And Retracted Article About President Clinton. DiGenova and Toensing were involved in a retracted Dallas Morning News article claiming that a Secret Service agent had witnessed President Clinton and Lewinsky in a "compromising situation."

When article was retracted, DiGenova tried to blame reporter who he gave the story to.

I could go on, but that's just feeding a troll. Suffice it to say DiGenova has been pushing slime for years, and has yet to be vindicated in any of it.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)