do you think differently about a 9 yr old car vs. a 10 yr old car?

[M A V I C]

space-time wrote:
[quote=hal]
[quote=M A V I C]
[quote=space-time]
what is a DD?

https://www.google.com/search?q=DD

https://www.google.com/search?q=dd+car&oq=dd+car&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.758j0j7&sourceid=chrome&espv=210&es_sm=91&ie=UTF-8

Always good to add the context

Daily Driver.
I was assuming Dodge Dart (my first car)
see M A V I C? even with context and it is still unclear
Guess I spend too much time on car forums

Ombligo wrote:
I would check the reliability ratings for both as well - it is not unusual for one year to have issues that the other may not. A 2003 may have a better track record than the 2004 due to some small manufacturing change.

And then there's certain cars like the Subaru Legacy GT wagon that only had a manual transmission in 2005.

[Lew Zealand]

No, my daily driver is 30 years old. 10 is a young 'un!

[Racer X]

Z wrote:
No.

Then again, my cars are 21, 23 and 43(!) years old.

Yeah, I think in decades, or body series.

[Harbourmaster]

nope.... both of them are basically the same for anyone that is not a trained automotive technician with the correct diagnostic equipment and special tools.


Note: both of the vehicles in my sig are vintage 1966...

[space-time]

Z wrote:
No.

Then again, my cars are 21, 23 and 43(!) years old.

Pictures or I don't believe it
Seriously, can you please post a pic of the older car? Thanks

[Harbourmaster]

Space... see my sig directly above. My daily driver 1966 VW is 47 years old. It came off the assembly line in February of 1966, the wife's Mustang convertible was built in August of 66.

[Z]

21 yo:

In its natural habitat

23 yo:

Summertime nap

43 yo:

34 View

[decay]

i know what i'd like to see in a DD

[cbelt3]

decay wrote:
i know what i'd like to see in a DD

38DD ON a Dodge Dart (hood) ? miley-shocked003:

[space-time]

Thanks for Pictures!!!