|
New (OB) Mini and TB display in the house!
|
01-31-2014, 01:12 AM
How much of that was the display? 27"? Is the Apple TB display really a lot better than the lower-priced competition? I'm starting to think about upgrading my 20" auxiliary Dell monitor with a 27" that would better match my 27" iMac—no TB here, however.
/Mr Lynn
01-31-2014, 02:16 AM
mrlynn wrote: The Apple Thunderbolt display is great because it has a built-in thunderbolt hub. If you don't need thunderbolt, there are a lot of better options. Even if you DO have TB, I dislike the ultraglossy finish of the Apple TB display.
01-31-2014, 02:21 AM
mrlynn wrote:$750
01-31-2014, 04:18 AM
If you don't need ultra-accurate color matching in your monitor, these make great alternatives:
LG 27EC33V-B Black 27" 5ms HDMI Widescreen http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as...6824005495 ViewSonic VA2703-LED Black 27" 3.4ms Widescreen http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as...6824116630 BenQ GW2750HM Glossy Black 27" 4ms (GTG) HDMI Widescreen http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as...6824014300 ViewSonic VX2703MH-LED Black 27" 3ms HDMI Widescreen http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.as...6824116568 Jeff
01-31-2014, 06:26 AM
kj4btkljv wrote: Those are 1920 x 1080. The TB display is 2560 x 1440
01-31-2014, 12:35 PM
Catzilla wrote: My late 2009 iMac is 2560 x 1440, too. Not that it's essential to match it exactly; my 20" Dell is just 1600 x 1200 (cost maybe $600 when I bought it, but that was quite a while ago). Given what NewEGG charges for the Apple TB display, that $750 looks like a good deal! /Mr Lynn |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
