Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
that touch of CLASS?!....class action lawsuit claims Apple intentionally broke FaceTime on iOS 6....
#1
.....to push users towards iOS 7 to save money on deal....there was a 'bug' that forced users to have to upgrade....


Lawsuit Alleges Apple Broke FaceTime on iOS 6 to Force iOS 7 Upgrades, Save Money

.....Christina Grace of California has filed a new class-action lawsuit that alleges Apple broke FaceTime in iOS 6 to force users to upgrade to iOS 7, reports AppleInsider. According to the lawsuit, Apple forced users to upgrade so it could avoid payments on a data deal with Akamai.

The class action found its genesis in internal Apple documents and emails disclosed in the VirnetX patent infringement lawsuit, which eventually ended in Apple paying $302 million after a retrial. Apple used two connection methods when launching FaceTime in 2010: a peer-to-peer method that created a direct connection between two iPhones and a relay method that used data servers from Akamai.

When Apple's peer-to-peer FaceTime technology was found to infringe on VirnetX's patents in 2012, Apple began to shift toward Akamai's servers to handle iPhone-to-iPhone connections. A year later, Apple was paying $50 million in fees to Akamai, according to testimony from the VirnetX trial. The class-action lawsuit, pointing to an internal email titled "Ways to Reduce Relay Usage," alleges that the growing fees were beginning to bother Apple executives.

Apple eventually solved the problem by creating new peer-to-peer technology that would debut in iOS 7. The class-action lawsuit, however, alleges that Apple created a fake bug that caused a digital certificate to prematurely expire on April 16, 2014, breaking FaceTime on iOS 6. Breaking FaceTime on iOS 6, the lawsuit claims, would allow Apple to save money on users who did not upgrade to iOS 7.

At the time, Apple recognized the bug, publishing a support document saying that users who were having FaceTime connectivity problems after April 16, 2014 could update to the latest software to fix the issue. The same support document eventually removed the date "April 16, 2014," according to AppleInsider.

The lawsuit later points to an internal Apple email chain in which an engineering manager mentions that they were looking at the Akamai contract for the upcoming year and understood that Apple "did something" to reduce usage of Akamai's services. Another engineer responded by pointing out iOS 6 leaned a lot on Akamai's services and that Apple "broke iOS 6" and the only way to fix FaceTime was to upgrade to iOS 7.

Apple's developer page pegged iOS 7 adoption at 87 percent on April 7, 2014, nearly 10 days before Apple allegedly broke iOS 6. The lawsuit claims that forcing iPhone 4s and 4 users to upgrade to iOS 7 was harmful to them because the software would allegedly crash more and run more slowly.

The lawsuit is seeking undisclosed damages and to prove Apple violated California's unfair competition law.



a suit...............of many colors............?!
_____________________________________
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
Reply
#2
I remember that and I was quite upset, since I had to upgrade my iPhone from iOS 6 to iOS 8 and also my 10.6.8 computer stopped working with Facetime.
Reply
#3
I despise class action lawyers. $MM for the lawyers, the people actually affected get a.. coupon. Probably for a free Frostee at Wendy's
Reply
#4
I LOVED iOS6. On my iPhone4, it was rock solid. iOS7 effectively bricked my iPhone4. Of course, Apple would NOT let people "downgrade" back to iOS6. One reason I bought my first iPad Mini, was that it came with iOS6 (which I'm still running!). I hope Apple gets taken over the coals if there's even a shred of truth in this claim. :villagers:
Reply
#5
testcase wrote:
I LOVED iOS6. On my iPhone4, it was rock solid. iOS7 effectively bricked my iPhone4. Of course, Apple would NOT let people "downgrade" back to iOS6. One reason I bought my first iPad Mini, was that it came with iOS6 (which I'm still running!). I hope Apple gets taken over the coals if there's even a shred of truth in this claim. :villagers:

I don't remember if I ever used iOS 6. But I can sympathize: iOS 10 broke my favorite third-party music player for iDevices, and it is no longer available through the App store. No idea why. Unless it gets revived and updated, I am stuck with options that I like far less. Fortunately I still have one device left that can hold a lot of music and is on iOS 9.3.5. And there it will stay unless TuneShell comes back from the dead.

It's fscking ridiculous that there is no way to restore an earlier system, when the upgrade has broken something that is critical for the user.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)