Do you care that Rosanne is leaving the USA?

[pdq]

Steve G. wrote:
[quote=pdq]
Well, to be fair, it is a option for Jews anywhere, which if I'm not mistaken, is unique in the developed world. Where else do you get citizenship just for the asking?

She's not trying to become a citizen. Try again.
She says "And that's where I'm going to go and probably move somewhere there and study with my favorite teachers."

I thought she meant she was moving there, like for good. Perhaps I misinterpreted her intent.

Edit: ...and I don't mean my comment to be taken negatively. For instance, I know a woman who was dissatisfied by her corporate workplace in the states, and decided to move her whole family to Israel and kind of start anew (or at least stated her intent to do so). I just find the ability to do this remarkable in many ways.

[SteveG]

You can move to Israel without becoming a citizen, ya know.
It's called 'moving someplace else for a while'. I hear it's done a lot.

[DeusxMac]

Sadly, she appears to be neither well educated nor as inherently intelligent as she thinks she is.

"At 16, Barr was hit by a car; the incident left her with a traumatic brain injury. Her behavior changed so radically that she was institutionalized for eight months at Utah State Hospital."
"In 1970, when Barr was 18 years old, she moved out by informing her parents she was going to visit a friend in Colorado for two weeks, but never returned.["

[max]

pdq wrote:
[quote=Steve G.]
[quote=pdq]
Well, to be fair, it is a option for Jews anywhere, which if I'm not mistaken, is unique in the developed world. Where else do you get citizenship just for the asking?

She's not trying to become a citizen. Try again.
She says "And that's where I'm going to go and probably move somewhere there and study with my favorite teachers."

I thought she meant she was moving there, like for good.. Like moving to India to study in an ashram with some guru?
Would that indicate an intent to become an Indian citizen, in your world, pdq?

Sheesh, comprehension is a major problem for you, or is it your raging stereotyping bigotry that does it, pdq.......

[Sam3]

max wrote:
[quote=pdq]
[quote=Steve G.]
[quote=pdq]
Well, to be fair, it is a option for Jews anywhere, which if I'm not mistaken, is unique in the developed world. Where else do you get citizenship just for the asking?

She's not trying to become a citizen. Try again.
She says "And that's where I'm going to go and probably move somewhere there and study with my favorite teachers."

I thought she meant she was moving there, like for good.. Like moving to India to study in an ashram with some guru?
Would that indicate an intent to become an Indian citizen, in your world, pdq?

Sheesh, comprehension is a major problem for you, or is it your raging stereotyping bigotry that does it, pdq.......
I thought personal attacks were forbidden in this forum. I guess the forum TOS doesn't apply to some people, like point 4: Attack the Argument, Not the Individual.

Or, maybe it's open season again and we can attack whomever we want with no repercussions.

[max]

Sam3 wrote:

I thought personal attacks were forbidden in this forum. I guess the forum TOS doesn't apply to some people, like point 4: Attack the Argument, Not the Individual.

Or, maybe it's open season again and we can attack whomever we want with no repercussions.

Do you mean like this, Sam3?....

max wrote:
[quote=Sarcany]
I think I've found the sub-text in all of max's recent posts:

HOW DARE THE GREAT EVIL ONE TURN OUT TO BE HONEST AND BEYOND REPROACH AND IN ALL WAYS A BETTER PERSON THAN I COULD EVER BE OR IMAGINE!!

To see Clinton as HONEST AND BEYOND REPROACH you must be imbibing your Koolaide in 55-gallon drums.
The only difference between Clintons corruption and that you allege of Trumps is that Clintons have been playing this game a lot longer and are that much better at taking the money with plausible cover....

Instead of looking for excuses for your election loss where none exists, you could take off your ideological blinders and see exactly what max is saying.

You lost the election.
You won the election for Trump.
Clinton lost the election because she was not what this country wanted.
Clinton lost the election because she was an avowed warmonger.
Clinton lost the election because she was as corrupt as the Democratic Party she got to front her.
Clinton elected Trump after she removed the only viable alternative to Trump, Bernie Sanders.
It was not the Russians, it was Clinton who lost the election for Clinton.
It was not FBI, it was Clinton who lost the election for Clinton.
It was not the Electoral College, it was Clinton who lost the election for Clinton.
It was not Cambridge Analytica, it was Clinton who lost the election for Clinton.
It was not Facebook, it was Clinton who lost the election for Clinton.

And the very basic part of max comments you are so studiously are trying to avoid,
the most inconvenient part, look in the mirror, there is not an iota of difference between the two major parties. When you point your finger at the Republicans, there is the very same finger pointing back.

You all had a chance to finally make a difference, you could have voted your conscience, you could have had Bernie. This was the closest we have had come in decades to have some fundemental reform in this country.
You decided to go with the corrupt Democratic machine, "the lesser evil".
The lesser evil is still evil.

You could have voted your conscience, you voted for evil....
As undesrstood by pdq:...

pdq wrote:
[quote=max]
...froth...spittle...rage...

:

...or this recurring personal attack by somebody unable to argue the actual subject under discussion, notice complete lack of anything cogent to the OP...
http://forums.macresource.com/read.php?2...sg-2279546

[Carnos Jax]

Ah max, made his bed but refuses to lay in it...using personal attacks as his defacto go to, then complaining when others do it to him in return.

[$tevie]

Goodbye, Roseanne. Don't let the door hit you where the Good Lord split you.

[bfd]