mattkime wrote:
[quote=deckeda]
Sounds like Teams within Teams (yeah, I know). Groups of people, and the chats and files that belong to that group. Never used Slack but I can’t imagine it’s not far more mature. Teams is simple, not terribly capable beyond basics.
I was assuming teams was decent but now I'm not so sure.
How many people need access to these files within your company?
Not many? These would be small groups of 2-10 people. And then some other group would be having their own conservations and files shared. Does MS use Sharepoint as the backend for that? Doesn’t seem to be a factor here as far as the interface is concerned.
I don’t envision any social channel software being a file repository, just a way to access files “for awhile” that would otherwise be part of siloed email chains or manually stores locally or tossed on a network drive or hanging out in some online place such as FilesAnywhere.