02-25-2011, 06:19 PM
I don't think he was taken aback at all. He is the king of the reactionary, paranoid, anti-Obama crowd, he has surely heard this sentiment many times before.
His reaction was one of empathy for the person who made the comment, he made no effort to distance himself from that type of talk.
Even if he suspected that the person making the comment had dementia or some other mental illness, he still needed to address the content of what was said, once it was out there. It could have been done so easily, something like "I do not condone violence of any sort. That kind of talk has no place in a civil debate about politics."
How hard can that be? How obvious to a thinking leader?
His reaction was one of empathy for the person who made the comment, he made no effort to distance himself from that type of talk.
Even if he suspected that the person making the comment had dementia or some other mental illness, he still needed to address the content of what was said, once it was out there. It could have been done so easily, something like "I do not condone violence of any sort. That kind of talk has no place in a civil debate about politics."
How hard can that be? How obvious to a thinking leader?