New Forum "style" . . .

[rexrzer]

I thought my Dual Core G5 had blown up or something! I hope they get things fixed by tomorrow...no Reply box? Huh? And I can't quote a message?

Hmmmmm,...maybe they will get this sorted out soon. Hope the software is easy to repair!

_______________

[blusubaru]

Yes, as others have said, not having the reply box at the bottom of a thread is pointless. Also, the "tips and deals" link at the top of every thread doesn't do anything, but the one at the bottom does? This was how I got back to the forum (instead of back button and refresh), as well as page one if I was several pages deep. Oh, and I hate courier. We're not on typewriters anymore here. And what's this rumor about no more emoticons?

All in all, lots of good stuff. Only four little things to pick on.

[ho'ard]

Do you guys read any of the other threads?
The OWC Jim somehow decided the reply box thing was a complex problem, and promised it would be fixed.
I don't understand why everyone assumes these are all intentional changes.
I do think it's odd that the admin didn't leave some sort of note . . .

[ho'ard]

OK, apparently tweaks continued into the night because "reply via PM" is gone.

[LaserKun]

Right, they need to have the reply back at the bottom... we don't need nary extra steps.

[RAMd®d]

They need to have the Reply box on the same...

Oh, wait. That's been mentioned once or twice.

I'd like to see the Replies indented a space or two from the parent or original post.

I'm happy with this upgrade so far, and am ecstatic to see the Stickies gone.

[incognegro]

Memo to 'chip:

"Alot" isn't one word, it's two. "Allot" is a word, but it's not what you mean in your sig.

My 7th grade English teacher wrote this on the blackboard, and it stuck with me:

A                                                           LOT

I never ran them together after that.

[mrp-admin]

The reply via pm is a new feature but I removed it as noone seemed to want this.