Posts: 37,101
Threads: 2,599
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
can you be more specific?
Posts: 52,255
Threads: 2,802
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
2
But if Apple changed the Pro to a smaller form, I'd get one just because.
I don't need them, but I love the ability to have 2-4 internal HDs and upgradeable video cards, and an empty slot or two for other whatever-cards.
And four slots or more for memory.
Realistically, I don't see anything more for the Pros than the aforementioned speed bumps, increased baseline RAM and HD capacity.
Does the current Pro have T-Bolt connectivity? I see mention of a T-Bolt display, but only a Mini Displayport actually listed.
The older minis had MDPs while the latest is listed as a Thunderbolt port.
Posts: 21,860
Threads: 1,734
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
Apple needs to drop the Xeon's - very, very few people need server CPUs in their desktop. That would help them drop the price.
I could never own an iMac as long as it only has one HD. I always have one for boot/apps, and another for data.
Posts: 5,165
Threads: 147
Joined: Dec 2016
Filliam H. Muffman wrote:
[quote=M A V I C]
Apple needs to drop the Xeon's - very, very few people need server CPUs in their desktop. That would help them drop the price.
The server motherboards are about 5% slower for the same clock speed, and they take more expensive RAM.
I agree exactly with these two statements. The more expensive RAM part is the ECC stuff. Is that RAM and CPU type combo really necessary in the Mac Pro? That's a serious question...
Jeff