Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Sigma 18-200 versus Nikon 18-55 & 55-200
#1
This is my first comparison. I just shot these this afternoon. The nikon lenses all have MC UV filters. The sigma doesn't yet have the filter...so that may explain why the sky is a bit faded out.

http://www.speakeasy.org/~yeh/Sigma/Sigma.html
Reply
#2
Very cool. Thanks.

I was considering buying that same lens but wound up getting a Sigma 70-300mm with macro instead. The price was right, bought it off a friend for peanuts.
Reply
#3
I had to do the test to see if I was going to keep the lens in lieu of my nikons. I would give up a bit of quality for the ease of use. I'll have to pickup some faster lenses in the near future...maybe a nikon 80-200 2.8.

OTOH, I may be able to get away with the Tamron 28-75 lens....it's been rated as good and is fast enough for what I need.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)