Posts: 6,329
Threads: 1,075
Joined: Mar 2022
Reputation:
0
That is the problem. All of this so called healthcare program. Nothing will work as long as the program sold out to the Insurance Industry.
My mothers supplemental policy has gone up 8 times since in 1.5 years. All of these insurance co's are sock it to us now in preparation. Do you think Obama is going to regulate it then?? Too Late.
I guess everyone will just get fined, because the same people that can't afford insurance now, will never be able to afford it.
Posts: 26,415
Threads: 741
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
decocritter wrote:
I guess everyone will just get fined, because the same people that can't afford insurance now, will never be able to afford it.
Do you know nothing about ACA? While the insurance company sellout is definitely a bad thing (foisted upon us by the right wing heritage foundation), those who cannot afford insurance get government-subsidized coverage under ACA.
Posts: 11,076
Threads: 820
Joined: Jul 2019
Reputation:
0
davester wrote:
[quote=decocritter]
I guess everyone will just get fined, because the same people that can't afford insurance now, will never be able to afford it.
Do you know nothing about ACA? While the insurance company sellout is definitely a bad thing (foisted upon us by the right wing heritage foundation), those who cannot afford insurance get government-subsidized coverage under ACA.
A nice fantasy and a feel good sop for the limousine liberals.
That's is nothing the way it translates in the real world.....
Posts: 16,798
Threads: 723
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
max wrote:
A nice fantasy and a feel good sop for the limousine liberals.
That's is nothing the way it translates in the real world.....
Such responses remind me of this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbdjYy20q8Q
Posts: 11,076
Threads: 820
Joined: Jul 2019
Reputation:
0
Which part of my statement is incorrect, DM?
The fantasy part " While the insurance company sellout ...(foisted upon us by the right wing heritage foundation)", where "heritage foundation" had no legislative control over the Democratic control in the way the law was foisted upon us, but a total fabrication to absolve the guilty.
Or the real world part, the people I work with, the small businesses, calculating what they will have to close, how much penalties they will pay, how many people they will have to let go, just to survive.
And the individuals, who even after getting the subsidized insurance will avoid doctors like a plague, only because they cannot afford the inflated 40% copay.....
Posts: 37,947
Threads: 4,156
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
3
max wrote:
Which part of my statement is incorrect, DM?
If a liberal said, 'water is wet', you'd find a way to disagree. You do it in every damn thread. If you DON'T disagree, you change the subject to something disagreeable and THEN disagree. It's getting REALLY old...
Posts: 14,631
Threads: 2,362
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation:
0
Well said hal . . . Standing Ovation ~!~ :hail:
Posted by: hal [PM] [Ignore this user]
Date: July 09, 2013 07:56PM
Quote
max
Which part of my statement is incorrect, DM?
"If a liberal said, 'water is wet', you'd find a way to disagree. You do it in every damn thread. If you DON'T disagree, you change the subject to something disagreeable and THEN disagree. It's getting REALLY old..."
Posts: 46,542
Threads: 2,629
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
hal wrote:
[quote=max]
Which part of my statement is incorrect, DM?
If a liberal said, 'water is wet', you'd find a way to disagree. You do it in every damn thread. If you DON'T disagree, you change the subject to something disagreeable and THEN disagree. It's getting REALLY old...
Case in point: the Rick Perry thread. Thanks to the bad habit of people quoting max, I saw that he changed the topic to Al Gore because he had no reason to pick a fight regarding Rick Perry, and he figured Al Gore would make for better trolling.
Posts: 11,076
Threads: 820
Joined: Jul 2019
Reputation:
0
hal wrote:
[quote=max]
Which part of my statement is incorrect, DM?
If a liberal said, 'water is wet', you'd find a way to disagree. You do it in every damn thread. If you DON'T disagree, you change the subject to something disagreeable and THEN disagree. It's getting REALLY old...
No hal, I dont care what label you paint yourself, I have voted for Democrats if they were capable and competent, I have agreed with likes of Roger and Steve G when they were right, even defended their positions. But the fact is I do not run around posting little infantile :agree:.
And your liberals do not usually claim, 'water is wet', but 'look the bucket is full of p1ss' after they filled the bucket. Yeah, I am a spoil sport for pointing out the authorship....
Posts: 11,076
Threads: 820
Joined: Jul 2019
Reputation:
0
$tevie wrote:
Case in point: the Rick Perry thread. Thanks to the bad habit of people quoting max, I saw that he changed the topic to Al Gore because he had no reason to pick a fight regarding Rick Perry, and he figured Al Gore would make for better trolling.
Once again you missed the point, even on that thread, that there is no difference between the parties.
You are the one that is changing the subject of the OP, $tevie, presumably because it was inconveniently describing your gang of thugs.
I was on straight on the subject.
Who is doing the trolling, hon?...
|
