Posts: 2,345
Threads: 365
Joined: Apr 2021
I'm in the market for TV's and I'm debating between a 36" 4:3 Tube TV and a 32" 16:9 LCD. I'm not sure which one I'll go for yet, I'm still "weighing" the decision (which is about 180 lbs or so!).
What I guess I really want to know is what would the measurements of a 16:9 DVD be on a 36" 4:3 aspect ratio TV?
Thanks for the knowledge!
~A
Posts: 6,469
Threads: 536
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
Oops - that should read "With a 16:9 aspect ratio", not "With a 16"9 aspect ratio".
On a different topic - tahoedrew - are you in Tahoe? Just wondering how the snow conditions are. I've got an itch to hit the slopes soon, but haven't heard anything good about the local mountains, and a coworker who went to Mammoth a week ago said that the upper mountain is still closed.
Posts: 52,153
Threads: 2,793
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
1
Within the last three or four days, somebody posted a link that showed exactly what you want to know.
You could pick two different screen sizes and compare different image sizes on each screen.
My current main TV is a older Sony 32" XBR. To watch a 16:9 DVD on a TV that would give me the same height image as on my 32" 4:3, I'd have to get a 42" 16:9 TV (or bigger).
I wish I had some keywords to help you find that link. I neglected to bookmark it.
Posts: 52,153
Threads: 2,793
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
1
Sorry about the herring.
I bookmarked it this time.
Posts: 1,503
Threads: 104
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation:
0
Definitely go with the HD LCD and not the CRT, if only for the weight -- you won't be able to carry the Tube by yourself... but the most important reason is overall compatibility and picture quality. Everyone always says that Tubes don't have a native resolution, which is BS. The native res. of color CRTs is the dot (or stripe) pitch, and it's no better than HD flat screens.