Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Florida man arrested for pulling AR-15 rifle on Uber driver dropping off daughter
#11
Mr645 wrote:
[quote=pdq]
[quote=Mr645]
quick, take away other peoples freedom.

I would never dream of taking away one’s freedom to point an assault rifle in the face of random Uber drivers and take them to the ground.

:wink:
In what world do people have the right to aim rifles at innocent people?
Missouri

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Louis_...g_incident

"On August 3, 2021, Parson pardoned the McCloskeys."

Reply
#12
pdq wrote:
Sounds like he could use a little therapy himself.

Or a lot. And some drugs. And a reg flag law to get the damn guns before he kills somebody. .
Reply
#13
GGD wrote:
[quote=Mr645]
[quote=pdq]
[quote=Mr645]
quick, take away other peoples freedom.

I would never dream of taking away one’s freedom to point an assault rifle in the face of random Uber drivers and take them to the ground.

:wink:
In what world do people have the right to aim rifles at innocent people?
Missouri

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Louis_...g_incident

"On August 3, 2021, Parson pardoned the McCloskeys."


In this case the AR-15 likely prevented great loss of life or property. AS a large crowd broke down a gate to enter the private road and marched down said road yelling aggressively.
Reply
#14
Mr645 wrote:
In this case the AR-15 likely prevented great loss of life or property.

Physician heal thyself.

You’re spouting the “Guilty until proven innocent” you constantly rail against yourself.

…and that gate wasn’t “smashed” by the protesters to gain entry.

”…a live stream from the front of the march shows that the first protesters walked through an intact gate that was being held open...the gate was unlocked when the first marchers entered.”

“It remains unclear at what point the gate was damaged, and by whom.”


https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-53891184
Reply
#15
DeusxMac wrote:
[quote=Mr645]
In this case the AR-15 likely prevented great loss of life or property.

Physician heal thyself.

You’re spouting the “Guilty until proven innocent” you constantly rail against yourself.

…and that gate wasn’t “smashed” by the protesters to gain entry.

”…a live stream from the front of the march shows that the first protesters walked through an intact gate that was being held open...the gate was unlocked when the first marchers entered.”

“It remains unclear at what point the gate was damaged, and by whom.”


https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-53891184

Sure, tresspass on private property is legal because they are protesting...
Reply
#16
wowzer wrote:
[quote=DeusxMac]
[quote=Mr645]
In this case the AR-15 likely prevented great loss of life or property.

Physician heal thyself.

You’re spouting the “Guilty until proven innocent” you constantly rail against yourself.

…and that gate wasn’t “smashed” by the protesters to gain entry.

”…a live stream from the front of the march shows that the first protesters walked through an intact gate that was being held open...the gate was unlocked when the first marchers entered.”

“It remains unclear at what point the gate was damaged, and by whom.”


https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-53891184

Sure, trespass on private property is legal because they are protesting...
It can be legal depending on the circumstances.
Reply
#17
wowzer wrote:
[quote=DeusxMac]
[quote=Mr645]
In this case the AR-15 likely prevented great loss of life or property.

Physician heal thyself.

You’re spouting the “Guilty until proven innocent” you constantly rail against yourself.

…and that gate wasn’t “smashed” by the protesters to gain entry.

”…a live stream from the front of the march shows that the first protesters walked through an intact gate that was being held open...the gate was unlocked when the first marchers entered.”

“It remains unclear at what point the gate was damaged, and by whom.”


https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-53891184

Sure, tresspass on private property is legal because they are protesting...
Perhaps you're not familiar with the concept of Civil disobedience. You should read up on it.

"Civil disobedience is the active, professed refusal of a citizen to obey certain laws, demands, orders or commands of a government (or any other authority). By some definitions, civil disobedience has to be nonviolent to be called 'civil'. Hence, civil disobedience is sometimes equated with peaceful protests or nonviolent resistance."
Reply
#18
DeusxMac wrote:
[quote=wowzer]
[quote=DeusxMac]
[quote=Mr645]
In this case the AR-15 likely prevented great loss of life or property.

Physician heal thyself.

You’re spouting the “Guilty until proven innocent” you constantly rail against yourself.

…and that gate wasn’t “smashed” by the protesters to gain entry.

”…a live stream from the front of the march shows that the first protesters walked through an intact gate that was being held open...the gate was unlocked when the first marchers entered.”

“It remains unclear at what point the gate was damaged, and by whom.”


https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-53891184

Sure, tresspass on private property is legal because they are protesting...
Perhaps you're not familiar with the concept of Civil disobedience. You should read up on it.

"Civil disobedience is the active, professed refusal of a citizen to obey certain laws, demands, orders or commands of a government (or any other authority). By some definitions, civil disobedience has to be nonviolent to be called 'civil'. Hence, civil disobedience is sometimes equated with peaceful protests or nonviolent resistance."
So January 6th was just Civil Disobedience? Or does that only apply to causes that align with your views
Reply
#19
Mr645 wrote:
[quote=DeusxMac]
[quote=wowzer]
[quote=DeusxMac]
[quote=Mr645]
In this case the AR-15 likely prevented great loss of life or property.

Physician heal thyself.

You’re spouting the “Guilty until proven innocent” you constantly rail against yourself.

…and that gate wasn’t “smashed” by the protesters to gain entry.

”…a live stream from the front of the march shows that the first protesters walked through an intact gate that was being held open...the gate was unlocked when the first marchers entered.”

“It remains unclear at what point the gate was damaged, and by whom.”


https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-53891184

Sure, tresspass on private property is legal because they are protesting...
Perhaps you're not familiar with the concept of Civil disobedience. You should read up on it.

"Civil disobedience is the active, professed refusal of a citizen to obey certain laws, demands, orders or commands of a government (or any other authority). By some definitions, civil disobedience has to be nonviolent to be called 'civil'. Hence, civil disobedience is sometimes equated with peaceful protests or nonviolent resistance."
So January 6th was just Civil Disobedience? Or does that only apply to causes that align with your views
What part of "... civil disobedience has to be nonviolent to be called 'civil'. Hence, civil disobedience is sometimes equated with peaceful protests or nonviolent resistance" Xare you incapable of understanding??


“We won with poorly educated…" "I love the poorly educated!"
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)