Posts: 1,844
Threads: 215
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation:
0
I chose a different volume to start up from, renamed it and then restarted, It couldn't find an OS9 volume to start from, so it went to the slave drive to start. When I chose the slave drive, well it then went to the renamed volume on the master drive. I guess a volume on the master drive gets priority no matter what, but this is sure weird behaviour. We at least I proved that booting from a slave drive is possible, the problem is getting it to be reliable.
Posts: 13,726
Threads: 599
Joined: Nov 2024
Reputation:
0
Them dang slaves!
They ain't n'er reliable!
Posts: 4,343
Threads: 408
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 37,099
Threads: 2,599
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
yeah, i think i experienced that before too.
reread my previous recommendation.
Posts: 4,682
Threads: 1,378
Joined: Apr 2025
Reputation:
0
been a long time, but wasn't that a problem only with revision 1 B&Ws?
Revision 2s don't have that problem.
If you have a Rev 1, the only solution is an internal ata pci card....
Posts: 1,844
Threads: 215
Joined: Apr 2006
Reputation:
0
nope this is a rev 2. it's a 450 and all 450s were rev 2s.
Posts: 1,270
Threads: 130
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
2
Guitarman, perhaps it is an OS 9 issue? My son has a 450mhz B&W and has had no problems booting from the slave drive under OS 10.3.9. Good Luck! Dave
...on the trailing edge of technology.