Stupidest NY Times "Blog" I've read all day- Superbowl ad criticism...

[cbelt3]

Yep, those Arch Liberals at the NYT are at it again

Handwringing re Re "Focus on the Family" ad.
"The commercial in the pre-game coverage does not include the word “abortion,” and is worded so carefully that an uninformed viewer might not know what the subject of the spot is. Focus on the Family is a conservative organization that is against abortion and gay rights."

Happy Gay Rights cheering
"The implication was that Ms. Fox’s naughty pictures could even come between a gay couple. It was a nice moment of inclusion rather than exclusion."

PMSing about "Man Centered" Ads vis Bud Light and so forth
"The overly masculine tone is upsetting many people who are posting comments to blogs about the Super Bowl spots, particularly women, who are decrying those spots as misogynistic."

My opinion ?

- - - -
Jeez. Put on your big girl panties and get a life ! This is about FOOTBALL !!!!! Manly Man stuff ! Grunt ! New Agey Metro Girly Men NOT WANTED !

[Acer]

They are just disappointed that the pro-life as was tasteful and subtle. They were expecting fetuses, I guess.

[Lux Interior]

cbelt3 wrote: New Agey Metro Girly Men NOT WANTED !

Can't play the game without a QB.

[cbelt3]

Lux Interior wrote:
[quote=cbelt3]New Agey Metro Girly Men NOT WANTED !

Can't play the game without a QB.
You know, you DO have a point. Ever since Namath and the Panty Hose thing... Still... gotta be tough to take a 400lb linebacker hit, even if you're all GQ-ey after the game (assuming your eyes stop knocking together long enough).