L.A. Times: "Health insurers pour money into GOP campaigns, hoping to limit new regulations"

[Acer]

What we need is a conservative who can sensibly explain his viewpoint in the context of a give-and-take discussion (as opposed to a monologue from a radio microphone, or a talking-point spewing puppet.) The closest thing we have is cbelt, and he veers to the center too often to be any fun.

[$tevie]

kanesa wrote:
[quote=Dakota]
This is a change, for the worse, from what I have now and 0bama is responsible for it. Not to mention the 15.6% rise. Besides, what am I doing debating the merits here? Half of my paycheck may go for premiums but hacks like you who have to cover for 0bama at any cost will come out and claim, and lie if you have to, that it has always been like this. Well, it hasn't.

Get a second job. Don't be so lazy. Or quit your job and get another job that gives you better benefits. All you do is whine and complain. (tu)

[Go To Top]

Plus foreign companies pouring money into the Chamber for TV ads for repubs.

[Rick-o]

kanesa wrote:
[quote=Dakota]
This is a change, for the worse, from what I have now and 0bama is responsible for it. Not to mention the 15.6% rise. Besides, what am I doing debating the merits here? Half of my paycheck may go for premiums but hacks like you who have to cover for 0bama at any cost will come out and claim, and lie if you have to, that it has always been like this. Well, it hasn't.

Get a second job. Don't be so lazy. Or quit your job and get another job that gives you better benefits. All you do is whine and complain.
Bravo! :biggrin:

[Mac1337]

So I should get a second job so someone's "kid" gets to stay on daddy's plan until 26( and spend the money on beer and women)? No wonder Newt called you guys the party of food stamps. That's all you have to offer to society. Oh, and this.

[RgrF]

That was built under the Eisenhower Administration then turned over to local housing authorities to manage and maintain.

You truly don't know much that isn't force fed you by Fox & Friends, do you?

[$tevie]

Dakota wrote:
So I should get a second job so someone's "kid" gets to stay on daddy's plan until 26( and spend the money on beer and women)?

[Dennis S]

RgrF wrote:
That was built under the Eisenhower Administration then turned over to local housing authorities to manage and maintain.

You truly don't know much that isn't force fed you by Fox & Friends, do you?

Dakota, do you not have enough brains to realize that you lose damn near every one of these arguments?

[Mac1337]

The person who posts pictures of birds loses the argument. How can you lose an argument with this? Your other social programs are just as much a wreck, it is just that there are no pictures,

[kanesa]

Dakota wrote:
So I should get a second job so someone's "kid" gets to stay on daddy's plan until 26( and spend the money on beer and women)? No wonder Newt called you guys the party of food stamps. That's all you have to offer to society. Oh, and this.

Lame answer. It isn't free to stay on your parents' insurance. I bet you will do it with your kids once they get out of school. You'll cover them until they get a job with decent insurance.

Get a second job or change jobs for better benefits. You live in America now. Nothing is free but you can work for it.