It's all about Pakistan now

[swampy]

Question... Will Eric Holder continue to attempt to prosecute the intelligence operatives in the GWB error for "war crimes"?

[OWC Jamie]

Grace62 wrote:
[quote=billb]
[quote=Gutenberg]
You can't take it, kj. Neither can Dakota. If this particular shoe were on a Republican foot we would all be hearing what a magnificent accomplishment this is for the US and all of mankind. .

Um, actually we'd more likely be listening to the Left's drumbeat of impeachment for war crimes. Sovereignty invasions, god knows what else.
.
bill,
I'm sorry to hear that you were in a coma circa 2002-2008. I hope you're feeling better now. Now that you're awake, you'll want to seek better information sources than the rightwingnutosphere, particularly in the arena of "what the left thinks."
You don't have to go any further than to start at page 1 of this forum.
Nice spin.
You should be employable at DailyKos ( or Fox for that matter).

[Mac1337]

Gutenberg wrote:
You can't take it, kj. Neither can Dakota. If this particular shoe were on a Republican foot we would all be hearing what a magnificent accomplishment this is for the US and all of mankind. But since the President happens to be a Democrat, it's a terrible abuse of international law and an awful blow to our national image while somehow vindicating W's use of torture. Don't bother us with all of the Faux News Rush Limbaugh-Michelle Malkin crap.

Keep pretending you can hear me. I am praising Obama. What I am saying is that if he had listened to your types and the policies that the "base" has been advocating, none of this could have happened. From Mother Teresa to Genghis Khan in 24 hours. As the article said, how long before troops are once again called baby-killers? Didn't Obama himself say they terrorize women and children in Iraq or Afghanistan?

[Mac1337]

$tevie wrote:
[quote=Gutenberg]
You can't take it, kj. Neither can Dakota. If this particular shoe were on a Republican foot we would all be hearing what a magnificent accomplishment this is for the US and all of mankind. But since the President happens to be a Democrat, it's a terrible abuse of international law and an awful blow to our national image while somehow vindicating W's use of torture. Don't bother us with all of the Faux News Rush Limbaugh-Michelle Malkin crap.

Amen!
You meant Iman?

[Grace62]

billb wrote:
[quote=Grace62]
[quote=billb]
[quote=Gutenberg]
You can't take it, kj. Neither can Dakota. If this particular shoe were on a Republican foot we would all be hearing what a magnificent accomplishment this is for the US and all of mankind. .

Um, actually we'd more likely be listening to the Left's drumbeat of impeachment for war crimes. Sovereignty invasions, god knows what else.
.
bill,
I'm sorry to hear that you were in a coma circa 2002-2008. I hope you're feeling better now. Now that you're awake, you'll want to seek better information sources than the rightwingnutosphere, particularly in the arena of "what the left thinks."
You don't have to go any further than to start at page 1 of this forum.
Nice spin.
You should be employable at DailyKos ( or Fox for that matter).
Feel free to offer your intelligent, reality-based rebuttal if you disagree with anything.

[Seacrest]

swampy wrote:
Question... Will Eric Holder continue to attempt to prosecute the intelligence operatives in the GWB error for "war crimes"?

Freudian slip?
;-)

[August West]

Rudie wrote:


[quote=swampy]
Question... Will Eric Holder continue to attempt to prosecute the intelligence operatives in the GWB error for "war crimes"?

Freudian slip?
;-)
LMAO! Nice catch, Rudie !!

[swampy]

Sorry... but I think you knew I meant era and got the point.

[Grace62]

swampy wrote:
Sorry... but I think you knew I meant era and got the point.

What "war crimes" investigations are underway at DoJ? Didn't Holder announce a couple of years ago that DoJ was not going to investigate?

If you have updated info on that, please do share.

[Gutenberg]

I think Eric Holder is the new Nancy Pelosi. For the record, I have met and talked to him at length, before he became Attorney General, and he is a very decent man. He has principles, which is rare in recent Attorneys General.