Posts: 37,913
Threads: 4,147
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
Is this stuff still required reading? Never got around to it, but I feel it's one of the holes in my knowledge even though I don't hear it talked about as much these days.
what say you people?
Posts: 6,342
Threads: 815
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
It does go good with peyote. Didn't he turn out to be a fraud?
Posts: 41,879
Threads: 3,652
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
1
That was weird. Hi Phil or Rhonda!
Edit-- never mind-- Mr. Magoo moment.
Posts: 123
Threads: 6
Joined: Feb 2018
I'd vote yes. Even if it's fiction it's a good philosophical read. Peyote not necessary. :quotes:
Posts: 9,978
Threads: 645
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
No.
Actually, the first book is interesting and can read as factual if you ascribe any seeming "miracles" to peyote-think. But the philosophy can be found in other places, and more legitimate places, like Sufism.
he should have stopped with one book, but the more he wrote the less real his story became. in itself this is not a bad thing—when you read Sufis you see a lot of stuff that seems weird but isn't, in the context of their philosophy. however, Casteneda ended up living with three women who forsook family contact and who disappeared after his death. Sounds like a cult tome.
Posts: 8,777
Threads: 202
Joined: May 2025
Reputation:
0
I'm not sure that I can agree that Castenada's writings form the basis for a cult and Sufism doesn't.
Posts: 8,453
Threads: 761
Joined: Feb 2020
Reputation:
0
I particularly loved two ideas that I picked up from "The Teachings of Don Juan: A Yaqui Way of Knowledge."
One was the idea of finding your "place" and the other was the comment that the mind controls the drug, the drug doesn't control the mind.
At one time or another, I've been in touch with both of those ideas and I clearly benefited from knowing them.
This was one book that I enjoyed immensely and would recommend.
But, as I always say, "that's just my opinion, I could be wrong." YMMV! :oldfogey: