Just because you capture a duchess' bare bottom on film, does that mean you have to get it out there?

[Ombligo]

Better a pic of Kate than anyone else in the family

[Spock]

Ombligo wrote:
Better a pic of Kate than anyone else in the family

A picture of Charlie jug-ears wearing anal floss would make my eyes bleed.

[mrbigstuff]

Ombligo wrote:
Better a pic of Kate than anyone else in the family

perhaps you meant the other family

pippa

[Lemon Drop]

DeusxMac wrote:
Photoshop

and an extremely poor effort at that, I don't think even CNN would print that one.

[SteveG]

Ombligo wrote:
Better a pic of Kate than anyone else in the family

You ignore all the important work and innate handsomeness of the Saxe-Coburg/Gotha family?

[Lemon Drop]

[OWC Jamie]

There are thousands of identical pics of Kate's derriere online.
She's no prude unlike the photoshop deniers who can't contain their rampant envy.

[cbelt3]

Say what you want, but the lad found a lovely bride. And she appears to have the spirit necessary for the job... a tough job at that.

And she's got a lovely bum.

[Lemon Drop]

billb wrote:
There are thousands of identical pics of Kate's derriere online.
She's no prude unlike the photoshop deniers who can't contain their rampant envy.

Oh, right! Phony photos never get replicated across the interwebs.

Unless she comes out publicly and says this photo is legit, I assume it's not. As with pretty much everything regarding these people.

[SteveG]

Billionaires can afford that type of stuff. Don't ask me how this happened: