Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
USA says yes to Virgin and someone impregnates a Boeing 747
#1
They aren't related stories but they make for a hanging headline.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap_travel/200705..._bAdPMWM0F


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070519/ap_o...mdBXXMWM0F
Reply
#2
Looks like a sex toy.
Reply
#3
I would love to see that Dreamlifter in flight. Airbus has several similar but smaller ones called Beluga after the Beluga Whale. Two engines? Theirs is ugly, ours is pretty cool.


Reply
#4
if you're wife is carrying the baby on/in her BACKSIDE, you're doing it wrong.
Reply
#5
If doin' that way is wrong, I don't wanna be right!
Reply
#6
[quote spearmint]Theirs is ugly, ours is pretty cool.
One in this topic has been likened to a sex toy and your post shows the similarity between the other and an intelligent marine mammal with a permanent grin. I know which one I prefer.
Reply
#7
is this yet another US-industry-bashing thread?
Reply
#8
I am so pro Boeing it is scary. Airbus is subsidized by government money. However the government contracts given Boeing could be seen as a subsidy. Boeing builds beautiful stuff. Too bad the commercial ones are turned into cattle cars in the sky by the airlines with the seating.
Reply
#9
I thought that was ugly until I saw this

Reply
#10
[quote Dakota]I thought that was ugly until I saw this


That's the original! The Super Guppy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Guppy

Currently flying one is now housed at Ellington Field right by my house, and is used by NASA.

Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)