Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Roll call vote confirms Sotomayor, 68-31
#1
Teddy Kennedy was not present to vote.

Here's the tally (I think the breakdown by astrological sign is a hoot):

http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congr...votes/262/
Reply
#2
Sagittarians were quite gung ho for her.
Reply
#3
Well good for her. I hope she does a good job.

Next !
Reply
#4
What's with the Virgos, I wonder. Buncha sourpusses.
Reply
#5
"Don't be fooled by the seat that I got
I'm still, I'm still Sonia from the block
Used to have a little, now I have a lot
No matter where I go, I know where I came from, from the Bronx..."
Reply
#6
Go Sonia... Go Sonia... Go Soniaaa!
Reply
#7
I got a kick out of Al Franken making the announcement.

I half-expected a streaker with a clown-wig on to pop up and shout, "Live from New York...!" Smile
Reply
#8
You just have to know it's bad if Ted doesn't make this vote. Good news for billb is almost always bad news for the rest of us.
Reply
#9
We've certainly gotten our money's worth out of a respectable statesman that Ted Kennedy has been for Massachusetts.
The esteemed Senator has missed quite a few sessions in the last year due to chemo and radiation.

I hope Rgr doesn't represent all Californians in wishing ill health on anyone.
Reply
#10
So who are the dolts who voted against her and what is their justification. Sotomayer was on Bush's short list. I bet the hypocrites wouldn't have voted against her if he'd advanced the nomination. Partisan bullshitery is all it is.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)