Why tinker with our health care when it's the best in the world?

[Spock]

Acer wrote:
So, Mike Johnson ponies up out of his surplus to help someone who lacks. He didn't ask the guy how he handled money, or how much he drank, or if he smoked. He helped because the guy needed it.

If that's so laudable, why is public health care so contentious? Is it not the exact same thing?

I have no idea why it's so contentious and yes, it is the exact same thing.