02-09-2010, 10:27 PM
Funny, when the Dems blocked many of Bushes appointments it was a great and wonderful thing and the use of recess appointments was an evil thing.
Payback is hell or politics, something like that.
Obama is simply an incompetent. At first I was worried that he would implement his socialist, ultra leftist, neo-communist, Alinksy agenda :devil:, but after witnessing his legislative incompetence, I'm not so worried any more.
The only president in recent memory who had worse skills in dealing with Congress was James Earl Carter. At least Carter helped to craft most of his submitted legislation, whereas Obama has delegated the drafting to the most far left members of his party.
That was a disastrous (once again, not really for me ), choice, which lead to 2000 page documents, a lack of focus, and an elite, far left dismissal of the objections of middle America to Obama's agenda.
Getting legislation passed requires leadership, not divine aura, or endless speeches, or annoying lecturing.
Funny how the evil, incompetent George Bush was able for the most part, involve Democrats in his legislative agenda, but Obama is so ideologically rigid, he can't get the concept of compromise through his thick skull.
It is great for our side and the country : ) .
The Republicans have no incentive to cooperate with Obama, as his idea of bipartisanship to accept the Democratic far left agenda as is and unchanged. He idea of compromise is best summed up when he told the Republicans when they proposed their solutions, that "We won."
Arrogrance, immaturity, and a total lack of experience are at the core of Obama's legislative problems.
Unless Obama looks at how Lyndon Johnson or Ronald Reagan negotiated with Congress to implement their agendas, Obama is probably going to fail miserably. It will be his arrogance that will be his undoing.
Payback is hell or politics, something like that.
Obama is simply an incompetent. At first I was worried that he would implement his socialist, ultra leftist, neo-communist, Alinksy agenda :devil:, but after witnessing his legislative incompetence, I'm not so worried any more.
The only president in recent memory who had worse skills in dealing with Congress was James Earl Carter. At least Carter helped to craft most of his submitted legislation, whereas Obama has delegated the drafting to the most far left members of his party.
That was a disastrous (once again, not really for me ), choice, which lead to 2000 page documents, a lack of focus, and an elite, far left dismissal of the objections of middle America to Obama's agenda.
Getting legislation passed requires leadership, not divine aura, or endless speeches, or annoying lecturing.
Funny how the evil, incompetent George Bush was able for the most part, involve Democrats in his legislative agenda, but Obama is so ideologically rigid, he can't get the concept of compromise through his thick skull.
It is great for our side and the country : ) .
The Republicans have no incentive to cooperate with Obama, as his idea of bipartisanship to accept the Democratic far left agenda as is and unchanged. He idea of compromise is best summed up when he told the Republicans when they proposed their solutions, that "We won."
Arrogrance, immaturity, and a total lack of experience are at the core of Obama's legislative problems.
Unless Obama looks at how Lyndon Johnson or Ronald Reagan negotiated with Congress to implement their agendas, Obama is probably going to fail miserably. It will be his arrogance that will be his undoing.