02-10-2010, 02:21 AM
I think an educated, intelligent, reasonably analytically-minded person always filters any "news" for accuracy, reflexively considering the source. There is really no news source I would trust 100%.
But Fox news spits out a constant stream of totally bizarre propoganda that any sane, informed, rational person would want to distance themself from as fully and as quickly as possible.
I would maybe watch for entertainment purposes if it weren't so damn effective, evidence you and a few others who frequent this forum.
It is indeed just too sad . . .
But Fox news spits out a constant stream of totally bizarre propoganda that any sane, informed, rational person would want to distance themself from as fully and as quickly as possible.
I would maybe watch for entertainment purposes if it weren't so damn effective, evidence you and a few others who frequent this forum.
It is indeed just too sad . . .
Grumpyguy wrote:
Dan Rather faked the Bush documents.
Charlie Gibson threw softball questions at candidate Obama while he grilled Palin (have the interviews if you want them).
I find the obsession with Fox odd and can only figure it is due to their "conservative" bent, while the "liberal" press is given a pass.
When I see you say, oh a CBS link, I will not click on that I will believe you.
Otherwise I see a bunch of people upset that tradition liberal networks are losing the rating wars because their coverage is predictably elitist and biased and the public is voting with their remote controls.
Live + Same Day Cable News Daily Ratings for February 8, 2010
P2+ Total Day
FNC – 1,460,000 viewers
CNN – 479,000 viewers
MSNBC –389,000 viewers
CNBC – 176,000 viewers
HLN –337,000 viewers
P2+ Prime Time
FNC – 3,018,000 viewers
CNN – 754,000 viewers
MSNBC –938,000 viewers
CNBC – a scratch w/80,000 viewers
HLN –585,000 viewers