04-10-2010, 08:43 PM
deckeda wrote:
So, an app whose purpose is to be an AppStore alternative would not / could not be denied for only that reason, under the old agreement. Is that it?
It wouldn't have to be that app's only purpose, and it might not even be apparent when Apple reviews it. So it was more likely that someone could do it under the previous agreement, and get away with it. If a big enough company did it, they could have had a solid legal case against Apple. Now they don't.